Interplay between Users and Social Media: “Pin” in WeChat Moments as an Example: From an Affordance Perspective

Shuyang Yu

doi:10.62051/syn89y47

Authors

Shuyang Yu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/syn89y47

Keywords:

Affordance; Pin; Social Media.

Abstract

This paper explores the newly released WeChat feature “pin” as an example to explore the gap in current research on affordance theory. WeChat, as the leading social media in China, displays distinct Chinese characteristics of socialization, which thus requires an in-depth investigation not only into the mechanism itself but also into the users’ psychology. Therefore, the author points out the theoretical gap in extant literature that the subject-object dichotomy hinders scholars from a more comprehensive study of social media and strives to promote a methodological revolution to combine the two categories. Modeled after the division of affordances’ emergence, perception, and actualization, this paper tentatively discusses the potential effects of “pin” on both posters and receivers in WeChat Moments. Most importantly, with a proposal for the revolution of extant theoretical methodology, this paper is aimed at providing a new perspective for ongoing research and encouraging an innovative model in future studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yan, Jinfang, A review of the researches on WeChat: submitted to ICSSTE (2015).

Yin, Hongyan. The Study on Uses and Gratifications Approach of WeChat (master’s thesis, Zhengzhou University), 2013.

Jiang, Mengdie. Intermittent Revocation: A study of “Visible for Three Days” in WeChat Moments from the Perspective of Self-presentation. Radio & TV Journal. (06), 146 - 147. (2018).

Deng, Chiyun. Analysis of User Characteristics and Psychological Factors of “Visible for Three Days” in WeChat Moments. Research on Transmission Competence. (35), 272. (2019).

Li, Piaopiao. Research on Privacy Boundary Settings and Management of social media (master’s thesis, Northwestern University), 2022).

Huang, Qianqian. WeChat Moments with the Feature of “Visible for Three Days”: Prudent Self-disclosure and Performance. New Media Research. (14), 20 - 23. (2020).

Eshraghian, F. and Hafezieh, N. Affordance Theory in Social Media Research Systematic Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Westminster Research. (2017).

Ronzhyn, A., Cardenal, A. S., & Batlle Rubio, A. Defining affordances in social media research: A literature review. New Media Soc., 25 (11), 3165 – 3188. (2023).

Chemero, A., Klein, C., & Cordeiro, W. Events as Changes in the Layout of Affordances. Ecol. Psychol., 15 (1), 19 – 28. (2003).

Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., & Kallinikos, J. (Eds.). Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (1st ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.

Bernhard, E., Recker, J., & Burton-Jones, A. Understanding the Actualization of Affordances: A Study in the Process Modeling Context. BPM. (2013).

Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., & Vitari, C. Affordance Theory in the IS Discipline: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. (2014).

Huang, Hebo. Perspective by the Other: Study and Reflection on the Imagined Affordances of Live-streaming Platform in the Operation and Practice of MCNs. Chin. J. Commun. (12), 77 - 95. (2021).

Zhu, H., & Miao, W. Should I Click the “Like” Button for My Colleague? Domesticating Social Media Affordance in the Workplace. JoBEM, 65 (5), 741 – 760. (2021).

Bullingham, L., & Vasconcelos, A. C. ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities. J. Inf. Sci., 39 (1), 101 – 112. (2013).

Gomez, M., Klare, D., Ceballos, N., Dailey, S., Kaiser, S., & Howard, K. Do You Dare to Compare? The Key Characteristics of Social Media Users Who Frequently Make Online Upward Social Comparisons. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., 38 (10), 938 – 948. (2022).

Hollenbaugh, E. E. Privacy Management Among Social Media Natives: An Exploratory Study of Facebook and Snapchat. SM+S, 5 (3). (2019).

Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research. In R. D. Galliers & M.-K. Stein (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (1st ed., pp. 232 – 245). Routledge. (2017).