Privacy Protection in the Digital Age: Challenges and Strategies

Yuejia Qu

doi:10.62051/cn9t7b17

Authors

Yuejia Qu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/cn9t7b17

Keywords:

Digital Technology, Privacy Protection, Legal Framework.

Abstract

In today's era of rapid digitalization, the protection of privacy faces serious challenges. This article comprehensively analyzes the main threats to privacy rights in the digital age, including the risks of information leakage brought about by technological advancements, the influence of social culture on the concept of privacy, and the lag in law and ethics in adapting to new technologies. Furthermore, the paper compares the privacy protection legal frameworks of different regions, such as the European Union's GDPR, the United States' CCPA, and China's PIPL, and demonstrates the application and challenges of each legal framework through specific cases. In terms of proposing solutions, the article suggests strengthening the protection of privacy rights from three aspects: legal, technological, and social education. Specific measures include refining relevant laws and regulations, enhancing legal enforcement and supervision, using encryption and anonymization technologies to protect personal information, and improving public awareness of privacy protection and cybersecurity education. These strategies aim to provide comprehensive support for the protection of individual privacy, addressing the various challenges of the digital age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Parliament, Council of the European Union: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1tion work requires the joint effora.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj, last accessed 2024/4/6

Melles, C., Kohn, B.: Rekordbußgeld in Höhe von 1,2 Milliarden Euro für Facebook-Mutter Meta Platforms Inc. 22. Mai 2023. Available at: https://www.taylorwessing.com/de/insights-and-events/insights/2023/05/newsflash-rekordbussgeld-fuer-meta

Brook, C.: Google Fined $57M by Data Protection Watchdog Over GDPR Violations. Retrieved from https://www.digitalguardian.com/blog/google-fined-57m-data-protection-watchdog-over-gdpr-violations

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP: CPRA Solutions. Available at: https://www.orrick.com/Solutions/CPRA?__cf_chl_tk=TbiCaoKO4eVfvOkhva1JDq7VB_wTLnJkzhpY2FFoYTc-1713191730-0.0.1.1-1599,last accessed 2024/4/11.

California State Legislature: California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Effective date: January 1, 2020.

Bonta, A.G.: Attorney General Bonta Announces Settlement with Sephora as Part of Ongoing Enforcement of California Consumer Privacy Act. Wednesday, August 24, 2022. Available at: https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-announces-settlement-sephora-part-ongoing-enforcement, last accessed 2024/4/6.

Standing Committee of the National People's Congress: Personal Information Protection Law of the People's Republic of China. Effective date: 11-01-2021.

PKULAW,https://www.pkulaw.com/lar/847ae1a7ce6df4d2da4c000ad04fadfabdfb.html?tiao=1&keyword=Republic of China. Eff,last accessed 2024/4/11.

Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission: Administrative Review of Network Security by the National Internet Information Office of CNKI in Accordance with the Law. Retrieved from https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-09/06/c_1695654024248502.htm

Jingwu Zhao. Theoretical Basis and Institutional Construction of Personal Information Anonymization. Chinese and Foreign Law Studies, 36(02), 326-345 (2024).