The Russo-Ukrainian conflict through Thucydidean lenses: fear, honor, and interest revisited

Authors

  • Shuang Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/61gvw902

Keywords:

diplomatic relations, Russia-Ukraine conflict, democratic values.

Abstract

In the backdrop of modern international relations, the Russo-Ukrainian conflict illustrates the enduring complexity of geopolitical struggles, emphasizing the significance of national sovereignty, territorial integrity, and international law's influence on global security and diplomatic relations. Thucydides' insights on the motivations of fear, honor, and interest provide a critical lens to analyze such conflicts, elucidating the motivations and strategies of involved states. The paper employs these concepts to dissect the underlying causes and potential impacts of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, revealing how Russia's pursuit of honor and interest, Ukraine's fear for its sovereignty, and the West's commitment to democratic values and international law intricately shape the conflict's dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babenko, V., Perevozova, I., Kravchenko, M., Krutko, M. and Babenko, D. 2020. Modern processes of regional economic integration of Ukraine in the context of sustainable development. E3S web of conferences. 166, pp.12001-12006.

Big-Alabo, T., & MacAlex-Achinulo, E. C. (2022). Russia-Ukraine Crisis and Regional Security. International Journal of Political Science, 8(1), 21-35, pp.21-35.

Cadier, D. 2019. The Geopoliticisation of the EU’s Eastern Partnership. Geopolitics. 24(1), pp.71–99.

Chestnut, S. C. 2022. China’s Response to War in Ukraine. Asian survey. 62(5–6), pp.751–781.

Crane, G. 2023. Thucydides and the ancient simplicity: The limits of political realism. Univ of California Press.

D'Anieri, P. 2023. Ukraine and Russia. Cambridge University Press.

Kortunov, A. 2023. The Russian-Ukrainian Conflict and the Future World Order. Russian politics. 8(2), pp.247–263.

Kwan, C.H. 2020. The China–US Trade War: Deep‐Rooted Causes, Shifting Focus and Uncertain Prospects. Asian economic policy review. 15(1), pp.55–72.

Lane, D. 2016. The International Context: Russia, Ukraine and the Drift to East-West Confrontation. International critical thought. 6(4), pp.623–644.

Lebow, R.N. 2006. Fear, interest and honour: outlines of a theory of International Relations. International affairs (London). 82(3), pp.431–448.

Lebow, R. N. 2012. International relations and Thucydides. Thucydides and the Modern World: Reception, Reinterpretation and Influence from the Renaissance to the Present, pp.197-211.

Muoneke, C. V., and Nnani, E. N. 2023. The Dynamism of International Law in Politics. Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy, 4(1), pp.736-752.

Musa, E., & Shehaj, J. 2023. Territorial Integrity of Ukraine in the View of International Law. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 10(1 S1), pp.77-77.

Ratcliffe, S. (ed.). 2016. Oxford essential quotations 4 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Roznai, Y. and Suteu, S. 2015. The Eternal Territory? The Crimean Crisis and Ukraine’s Territorial Integrity as an Unamendable Constitutional Principle. German law journal. 16(3), pp.542–580.

Tank, A. and Ospanova, A. 2022. Economic impact of Russia–Ukraine war. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology, 11(4), pp.3345-3347.

Thucydides. 1919. History of the Peloponnesian war. In Smith, C.F. (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tsygankov, A.P. 2018. The sources of Russia’s fear of NATO. Communist and post-communist studies. 51(2), pp.101–111.

Vladimir, P. 2021. Article by Vladimir Putin “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians.” Kremlin.ru, July 12, 2021, 17:00. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181

WOLFF, A.T. 2015. The future of NATO enlargement after the Ukraine crisis. International affairs (London). 91(5), pp.1103–1121.

Downloads

Published

29-08-2024

How to Cite

Hu, S. (2024). The Russo-Ukrainian conflict through Thucydidean lenses: fear, honor, and interest revisited. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 12, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.62051/61gvw902