Exploring the Territorial Jurisdiction of Cybercrime in the ICC: An Application of the Doctrine of “Effects”

Zilan Huang

doi:10.62051/61e72q59

Authors

Zilan Huang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/61e72q59

Keywords:

Cybercrime; Territorial Jurisdiction; ICC; The Doctrine of “Effects”.

Abstract

The doctrine of “effects”, as an objective application of territorial jurisdiction, has been controversial since its establishment. The dispute becomes more intense when it comes to cybercrime. In the area of International Criminal Law, while some practices in the international criminal court and tribunals indicate a trend towards expanding territorial jurisdiction, which implies the application of the “effects” doctrine, whether the Court can adopt the doctrine or not remains uncertain. In the background that the integration of cybercrime and crimes stipulated by the Court is becoming a trend, considering the necessity and feasibility of applying the “effects” doctrine to the International Criminal Court, it is argued that the doctrine should be applied to the Court’s territorial jurisdiction. However, some potential risks raised by the application require a more balanced solution for the problem, which means the “effects” doctrine can only be applied by the Court when there exists a substantial and reasonably foreseeable effect on the territory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ani Petrosyan. Internet usage worldwide-statistics & facts. 13 Feb. 2024. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/1145/internet-usage-worldwide/

Maillart J.B. The limits of subjective territorial jurisdiction in the context of cybercrime. Era Forum, 2019, 19(3): 375-390.

C. Viano E. Section II-Criminal law. Special part-information society and penal law: General report. Revue Internationale De Droit Pénal, 2013, (3): 335-355.

Samie, Najeeb. The doctrine of effects and the extraterritorial application of antitrust laws. Lawyer of the Americas, 1982, 14(1): 23-59.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2002, Preamble, Article 4(2), Article 7(1), Article 8(1), Article 8(2)(b)(i), Article 8(2)(b)(ii), Article 8(2)(b)(iv), Article 8(2)(e)(i), Article 12, Article 21, Article 30.

Klamberg, M. Commentary on the law of the international criminal court. Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2017.

Han Jingying, Ma He. The principle of effect rectification and the cause of our criminal law. Foreign Legal History Research, 2022, 24(00): 205-225.

Zelger, B. EU Competition law and extraterritorial jurisdiction-a critical analysis of the ECJ’s judgement in Intel. European Competition Journal, 2020, 16(2-3): 613-617.

Yan Han, Conflicts of international criminal jurisdiction and its settlement. Beijing Foreign Studies University, 2021.

Brenner, S. W., Koops, Bert-Jaap. Approaches to cybercrime jurisdiction. Journal of High Technology Law, 2004, 4(1): 10.

Greenberg, M. H. A Return to Lilliput: The “LICRA v. Yahoo!” case and the regulation of online content in the world market. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2003, 18(4): 1208.

Schmitt, Michael N., ed. Tallinn manual 2.0 on the international law applicable to cyber operations. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

The Prosecutor v. Charles Chankay Taylor, SCSL-03-01-T, Judgement, 18 May 2012.

Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, 2000, Article 1.

Gencor Ltd v. European Commission, 1999 E.C.R.753.

Associated Press. U.N. genocide advisor: Myanmar waged ‘scorched-earth campaign’ against the Rohingya. 13 Mar. 2018. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-myanmar-rohingyas-20180313-story.html

Decision on the “prosecutor’s request for a ruling on jurisdiction under article 19(3) of the statute”. ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18, 6 Sep. 2018.

Situation in the people’s republic of bangladesh/republic of the union of myanmar. ICC-01-09, 14 Nov. 2019.

Gabrielli G. Individual criminal responsibility of non-state actors operating in cyberspace for war crimes under the ICC statute. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series, 2023, 7: 287.

Roscini, M. Gravity in the statute of the International Criminal Court and cyber conduct that constitutes, instigates or facilitates international crimes. Criminal Law Forum, 2019, 30(3): 251.

Scharf, M. P. The ICC's jurisdiction over the nationals of non-party states: a critique of the U.S. position. Law and Contemporary Problems, 2001, 64(1): 64-73.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Article 34.

Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Judgement, ICTR-96-4, 2 Sep. 1998.