Conservative Theory of Expanding Supervision Compensation from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics

Authors

  • Zhaoyuan Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ptjhsy49

Keywords:

Supervision Compensation; Cybernetics; Compensation for Mental Damage; Behavioral Economics.

Abstract

Based on the reflection on the traditional theory of expanding compensation, protecting human rights, and urging the exercise of rights, using cybernetics and behavioral economics tools, the expansion of supervision compensation will make market norms erode social norms, coupled with the confrontational sense of the subject and object of compensation. According to empirical research, it has been proved that inspection compensation will be further transmitted into a disguised “redemption” claim. On the contrary, it loses the basic proof in general jurisprudence and welfare school. Based on acknowledging the “post-welfare school” and general jurisprudence, in order to increase the marginal amount of social welfare, safeguard human rights and promote the return of legal order, inspection compensation should be treated conservatively, including refinement, orderly limitation, and policy-oriented compensation and relief substitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang, Q. B. (2019). On the construction of supervision compensation system. Tribune of Political Science and Law, (03): 167.

Jiang, M. A. (2011). Administrative law and administrative procedure law. Beijing: Peking University Press, 70. See Liaoning Provincial Higher People’s Court (2020 No. 438).

Xia, J. W. & Wang, Y. H. (2001). Pursuing procedural justice—Analysis of Yasuhei Taniguchi's theory of procedural justice. Jiangsu Social Sciences, (02): 85.

Yu, W. G. (2013). German social assistance legal system and its enlightenment—Currently on extension of China’s administrative jurisprudence research field. Administrative Law Review, (01): 113.

Dai, M. Y. (2020). Judicial act and public order and good morals. The Jurist, (01): 17.

Liu, L. J. (2020). The evolution of the people’s sovereignty theory. Tribune of Political Science and Law, (03): 16.

Gao, X. G. (2016). Reform of payment order review procedure in China from the perspective of balance of interests. Social Scientists, (09): 113.

Thomas, B. P. (1980). Criminal injuries compensation social remedy or political palliative for victims of crime?. Toronto Butterworths.

Wei, J. (2001). The research on the analytical paradigm on today’s law and economics of the West. Xi’an: Doctoral Dissertation of Northwest University.

Wang, P. X. & Zhang, Y. J. (2020). On the use of economic analysis in legal methodology. Journal of Legal Philosophy, Legal Methodology and Artificial Intelligence, (62): 273.

Duan, J. J. (2024). Reflections on the theory and practice of humanistic economics in the perspective of “action-rule-space”. Journal of Soochow University (Philosophy & Social Science Edition), (03): 9.

Ma, J. J. (2023). On construction of national public property rights system in China. Law Review, (01): 22.

Sun, C. R. (2015). On the “circumstances” in the crime of corruption and accepting bribes—Taking the empirical analysis of the judgment considerations in the corruption cases of senior officials as the breakthrough. Political Science and Law, (10): 45.

Qiu, P. E. & Li, T. H. (2021). Analysis of legal attributes and related jurisprudence of supervision law. Research on Rule of Law, (01): 69.

Zheng, Y. C. (2024). “Potential” of life and power: A special perspective on Agamben’s political philosophy. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Science), (51): 96.

Gao, C. J. (2022). The theoretical position and practical requirements of the discourse of “living a happy life is the primary human right”. Political Science and Law, 1(10): 2.

Retrieved from https//www.ccdi.gov.cn/yaowen/202105/t20210520_242276.html on May, 19 2024.

Zhao, J. (2020). A quantitative research on control strategy of bribery crime. Chinese Journal of Law, (446): 151.

Hönl, A., Meissner, P. & Wulf, T. (2017). Risk attribution theory: An exploratory conceptualization of individual choice under uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, (67): 20-27.

Altltu, T. (1985). A study of the state compensation law system—Focusing on the “public power” in Article 1 of the state compensation law. Annual Report of the Institute of Social Sciences in Meiji University. 25: 20-26.

Itzel, P. (2013). Neuere Entwicklungen im Amts-und Staatshaftungsrecht–Rechtsprechungsüberblick 2012. Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht, 67(04): 197-202.

Anbo, K. (2009). Civil servant’s misconduct and state compensation. International Studies Series: Summary of Osaka International University, 22(02): 49-68.

Heyman, James & Dan Ariely. (2004). Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psychological Science, 15(11): 787-793.

Vohs, Kathleen, D., Nicole, L. M. & Miranda, R. G. (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(03): 208-212.

Vohs, Kathleen, D., Nicole, L. M. & Miranda, R. G. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science 314(5802): 1154-1156.

Christián, László, Erdős, A. & Háló, G. (2022). The background and repercussions of the George Floyd case. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(01): 2082094.

Kahn & Daniel, S. (2010). Presumed guilty until proven innocent: The burden of proof in wrongful conviction claims under state compensation statutes. U. Mich. JL Reform, 44: 123.

Zhang, Y. (2021). Further promote the joint investigation of bribery and corruption. People’s Daily. Assessed on September 28, 2021(007).

Miyazawa, S. (2011). Economic analysis of state compensation and claims. Social Science Studies, 62(02): 59-79.

Zhang, Y. J. (2023). Economic analysis of law: 20 lectures on methodology. Beijing: Peking University Press, 198-209.

Matsumura, Toshihiro, Matsushima, N. & Cato, S. (2013). Competitiveness and R&D competition revisited. Economic Modelling, 31: 541-547.

Vgl. Ossenbühl, Fritz. (1987). BGH, 12.3.1987—III ZR 216/85. Zur Staatshaftung für die nachteiligen Folgen eines verfassungswidrigen Gesetzes unter dem Gesichtspunkt des enteignungsgleichen Eingriffs. JuristenZeitung, 42(21): 1024-1028.

Steven, S. (2018). On liability and insurance. Economics and liability for environmental problems. Routledge, 151-163.

Zhang, C. F. et al. (1992). Answers to the state compensation law. Police Education Press, 7; Ye, L. L. (2003). Comparative legal research on the effect of state compensation legislation on judicial rights (Part II), Kumamoto Jurisprudence, 103: 72; (1995). Research on state compensation law. Law Press, 1.

He, P. (2009). On criminal infringement in special defense—Also on Deng Yujiao’s intentional injury case. Law Science, (8): 153.

Report by Xin Chunying, Deputy Director of the Legal Work Committee, at the Sixth Session of the Standing Committee of the Twelfth National People's Congress; Liang, G. D. (2014). Solving the difficulty of filing administrative litigation. The Peoples’ Congress of China, (02): 24-25.

Downloads

Published

08-07-2024

How to Cite

Zhang, Z. (2024). Conservative Theory of Expanding Supervision Compensation from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 9, 253-262. https://doi.org/10.62051/ptjhsy49