Water yield forecast in Shandong Province based on InVEST model

Authors

  • Yushan Li
  • Huawei Chen
  • Fulin Li
  • Long Jiang
  • Jian Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/s85vhy98

Keywords:

Land use; water yield; InVEST model; Shandong province.

Abstract

A better understanding of the effects of land use change and climate change on water yield is highly important for water resource planning and sustainable management. Land use changes in Shandong Province were analyzed over recent years. The PLUS Model was applied to forecast the land use layout for 2032, with adjustments made based on actual conditions and utilizing various CMIP6 scenarios for precipitation and actual evapotranspiration. The 2032 Water Yield was quantified using the InVEST Model at both grid and administrative scales, and its temporal-spatial characteristics and spatial correlation were analyzed. The findings revealed several key points: first, a decrease of 16.92% in arable land area, along with diminishing trends in grassland and unused land, and an increase of 33.92% in built-up land area, accompanied by growth in forest and water area. Second, the water yield decreases from southeast to northwest in Shandong Province, with significant inter-annual variations. Third, future predictions suggest that the annual water yield generally increases during flat water years, with offshore areas exhibiting greater water yield depth compared to inland areas. Rizhao is projected to have the highest water yield depth, while Binzhou and Dongying are expected to have the lowest depths, with a spatially positive correlation between them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheng Xia, Jing Huilin, Lu Xiayi. Current Situation and Suggestions on Yellow River

Zheng Xu, Wei Leming, Guo Jianjun, et al. Analysis of Driving Forces of Water Yield in Inland River Basin in Arid Regions Based on Geographic Detector: A Case Study of Shule River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(06): 1477-1485.

Zhang X, Chen X, Zhang W, et al.Impact of Land Use Changes on the Surface Runoff and Nutrient Load in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China[J].Sustainability, 2022, 14.

Sun Qi, Xu Changchun, Ren Zhengliang, et al. Spatial-Temporal Distribution and Driving Factors Analysis of Water Yield in the Tarim River Basin[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021, 40(08): 114-122. DOI: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2020698.

Sun Yanwei, Li Jialin, Ma Renfeng, et al. Spatial Distribution Pattern of Water Supply Services in Yuqiao Reservoir Basin[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2015, 26(06): 1-6.

Lang W D X. Projected land use changes impacts on water yields in the karst mountain areas of China[J].Physics and chemistry of the earth, 2018, 104.

Wu Jian, Li Yinghua, Huang Liya, et al. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Patterns of Water Yield in the Northeast Region of China and Its Driving Factors [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(11): 3216-3223. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201711.032.

Peng, S.Z., Ding, Y.X., Wen, Z.M., Chen, Y.M., Cao, Y., & Ren, J.Y. (2017). Spatiotemporal change and trend analysis of potential evapotranspiration over the Loess Plateau of China during 2011-2100. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 233, 183-194.

Peng, S.Z., Ding, Y.X., Liu, W.Z., & Li, Z. (2019). 1 km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017. Earth System Science Data, 11, 1931–1946.

C X L A B , B Q G A , C K C C ,et al.Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: A case study in Wuhan, China[J].Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 85[2024-01-26].DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2010.11541., 2004, 21 (1):10.48550/arXiv.2010.11541.

Zhou Wenzuo. Study on Soil Available Water Content of Major Soil Types in China Based on GIS [D]. Nanjing Agricultural University, 2004.

Downloads

Published

08-07-2024

How to Cite

Li, Y., Chen, H., Li, F., Jiang, L., & Zhang, J. (2024). Water yield forecast in Shandong Province based on InVEST model. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 9, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.62051/s85vhy98