Differences in Nicotine Dependence and Delay Discounting between Traditional and E-cigarette Users

Miao Wang

doi:10.62051/avjejx53

Authors

Miao Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/avjejx53

Keywords:

E-Cigarette; Nicotine Dependence; Delay Discounting; Impulsive Decision.

Abstract

The present study attempts to explore the differences in nicotine dependence and delay discounting between traditional cigarette and e-cigarette users. According to the Competing Neurobehavioral Decision Systems Theory, this study will also discuss the characteristics of impulsive decisions exhibited by smokers with these two different tobacco products. Study 1 used the Fagerström Nicotine Dependence Test (FTND) to investigate the nicotine dependence levels of traditional and e-cigarette users respectively. Based on study 1, study 2 adopted the Delay Discounting Task (DDT) to compare the difference in delay discounting among the non-smoking group, traditional cigarette group and e-cigarette group, with unrelated variables such as demography variables (gender, age, education) and nicotine dependence level controlled. The results showed that in Study 1, e-cigarette users had significantly higher nicotine dependence than traditional cigarette users. In Study 2, the degree of delay discounting between the traditional cigarette group and the e-cigarette group was significantly higher than that of the non-smoking group, while there was no significant difference in the degree of delay discounting between the traditional cigarette group and the e-cigarette group. The current findings suggest that e-cigarettes may exacerbate smokers' nicotine dependence. Traditional cigarette and e-cigarette users exhibit similar and significantly higher levels of delay discounting than the general population, indicating that the general connection between nicotine dependence and high levels of delay discounting is not influenced by different tobacco products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang C, Xiao D, Chi H. Summary of the Health Hazards of Smoking Report in China 2020. Chinese Journal of Circulation, 2021, 36(10): 937-952.

Berg C J, Barr D B, Stratton E, et al. Attitudes toward E-Cigarettes, Reasons for Initiating E-Cigarette Use, and Changes in Smoking Behavior after Initiation: A Pilot Longitudinal Study of Regular Cigarette Smokers. Preventive Medicine, 2014, 4(10): 789-800.

Ikonomidis I, Katogiannis K, Kostelli G, et al. Effects of electronic cigarette on platelet and vascular function after four months of use. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2020: 1-23.

Williams M, Villarreal A, Bozhilov K, et al. Metal and Silicate Particles Including Nanoparticles Are Present in Electronic Cigarette Cartomizer Fluid and Aerosol. Plos One, 2013, 8(3): 1-11.

Chapman S, Bareham D, Maziak W. The Gateway Effect of E-cigarettes: Reflections on Main Criticisms. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 2019, 21(5): 695-698.

Amlung M, Vedelago L, Acker J, et al. Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis of continuous associations. Addiction, 2017, 112(1): 51-62.

DeHart W B, Friedel J E, Berry M, et al. Comparison of delay discounting of different outcomes in cigarette smokers, smokeless tobacco users, e-cigarette users, and non-tobacco users. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2020, 114(2): 203-215.

González-Roz A, Secades-Villa R, Pericot-Valverde I, et al. Effects of Delay Discounting and Other Predictors on Smoking Relapse. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2019, 22(9): 1-7.

He Jiamei, Huang Xiting. The nature and brain mechanism of time discounting. Advances in Psychological Science, 2009, 17(1): 98-105.

Matusiewicz A K, Carter A E, Landes R D, et al. Statistical equivalence and test-retest reliability of delay and probability discounting using real and hypothetical rewards. Behavioural Processes, 2013, 100(1): 116-122.

Moody L, Franck C, Hatz L, et al. Impulsivity and polysubstance use: A systematic comparison of delay discounting in mono-, dual-, and trisubstance use. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2016, 24(1): 30-37.

Bickel W K, Mellis A M, Snider S E, et al. 21st century neurobehavioral theories of decision making in addiction: Review and evaluation. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2018, 164(1): 1-21.

Wesley M J, Bickel W K. Remember the future II: meta-analyses and functional overlap of working memory and delay discounting. Biological Psychiatry, 2014, 75(6): 435-448.

Bickel W K, Mellis A M, Snider S E, et al. Novel Therapeutics for Addiction: Behavioral and Neuroeconomic Approaches. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, 2016, 3(3): 277-292.

Ohmura Y, Takahashi T, Kitamura N. Discounting delayed and probabilistic monetary gains and losses by smokers of cigarettes. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 2005, 182(4): 508-515.

Sweitzer M M, Donny E C, Dierker L C, et al. Delay discounting and smoking: association with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence but not cigarettes smoked per day. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 2008, 10(10): 1571-1575.

Mushtaq N, Beebe L A. Psychometric Properties of Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence for Smokeless Tobacco Users (FTND-ST). Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 2017: 1-21.

Kai D, Yangang N, Yujie W, et al. Ego Depletion Promotes Impulsive Decision: Evidences from Behavioral and ERPs Studies [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(10): 1564-1579.

Jankowski M, Krzystanek M, Zejda J E, et al. E-Cigarettes are More Addictive than Traditional Cigarettes-A Study in Highly Educated Young People [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(13): 1-10.

Jones D M, Guy M C, Fairman B J, et al. Nicotine Dependence among Current Cigarette Smokers Who Use E-Cigarettes and Cannabis. Substance Use and Misuse, 2023, 58(5): 618-628.