A Spinozist Defense on Freedom of Conscience

Jinze Liu

doi:10.62051/5sqkyc67

Authors

Jinze Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/5sqkyc67

Keywords:

Spinoza; Freedom of Conscience; Right of Judgement; Totalitarianism; Human Flourishing.

Abstract

Spinoza tried to defend freedom of conscience in his political writings. To this end, he offers two arguments, one negative and the other positive. Negative arguments emphasize that a person’s right to judgment cannot be completely eradicated, and positive arguments emphasize the utility of protecting freedom of conscience. I argue that if Spinoza wants to criticize tyranny, he must emphasize positive arguments, even though he emphasizes negative ones more. I respond to Curley’s criticism of Spinoza by emphasizing positive argument.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bloom, I. trans., Ivanhoe, P. J. ed., 2011, Mencius, New York: Columbia University Press. Curley, E., 1995, “Kissinger, Spinoza, and Genghis Khan”, in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. by Don Garrett, Cambridge University Press.

Field, S. L., 2020, Potentia: Hobbes and Spinoza on Power and Popular Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lærke, M., 2021, Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

LeBuffe, L., 2021, “Citizens and States in Spinoza’s Political Treatise”, in Mind, Vol. 130, Issue. 519, pp.809-832.

Melamed, Y. Y., 2013, “Charitable Interpretations and the Political Domestication of Spinoza, or, Benedict in the Land of the Secular Imagination”, in Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, ed. by Mogens Lærke, Justin E. H. Smith, and Eric Schliesser, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.258-277.

Spinoza, B., 2016, The Collected Works of Spinoza: Volume II, ed. and trans. by Edwin Curley, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Steinberg, J., 2018, Spinoza’s Political Psychology: Taming Fear and Fortune, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.