Research on the Development and Innovative Management Models of Cultural Creative Parks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/q1nfcr26Keywords:
Cultural Creative Park; Management Models; Innovation Strategies.Abstract
Under the backdrop of the knowledge economy and globalization, the cultural creative industry, with its unique innovativeness and high added value, has gradually become a new driving force for economic development. Cultural creative parks, as vital platforms for the development of the cultural industry, have aggregated numerous creative enterprises and talents, becoming significant platforms for urban cultural innovation and cultural exchange. The innovation in development and management models of these parks is crucial for enhancing the competitiveness of the cultural industry and promoting urban cultural prosperity. However, with the rapid development of the cultural creative industry, traditional management models can no longer meet the developmental needs of these parks. Therefore, it is imperative to first clarify the functions of cultural creative parks, analyze the factors influencing their development one by one, base strategies on actual conditions, actively explore development and management models, establish market positioning, build on traditional management philosophies with modern management concepts, and strengthen brand building through resource optimization and integration. Implementing these strategies can effectively enhance the operational efficiency and service quality of cultural creative parks, attract more high-quality enterprises and talents, and promote the sustained and healthy development of the parks.
Downloads
References
Cucuzzella, C. The normative turn in environmental architecture. J. Clean. Prod. 2019,219, 552–565.
Cheng, L.; Chen, X.; Yang, S.; Cao, Z.; De Vos, J.; Witlox, F. Active travel for active ageing in China: The role of built environment. J. Transp. Geogr. 2019,76, 142–152.
Loughran, K. Urban parks and urban problems: An historical perspective on green space development as a cultural fix. Urban Stud. 2020,57, 2321–2338.
Evenson, K.R.; Sallis, J.F.; Handy, S.L.; Bell, R.; Brennan, L.K. Evaluation of Physical Projects and Policies from the Active Living by Design Partnerships. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2012,43, S309–S319.
Okafor-Yarwood, I.; Kadagi, N.I.; Miranda, N.A.F.; Uku, J.; Elegbede, I.O; Adewumi, I.J. The Blue Economy–Cultural Livelihood–Ecosystem Conservation Triangle: The African Experience. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020,7, 586.
Liu, Y.; Suk, S. Influencing Factors of Azerbaijan and China’s Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy under the One Belt One Road Initiative. Sustainability 2022,14, 187.
Ding, H.; Hung, K.-P.; Peng, N.; Chen, A. Experiential Value of Exhibition in the Cultural and Creative Park: Antecedents and Effects on CCP Experiential Value and Behavior Intentions. Sustainability 2021,13, 7100.
Jennings, V.; Larson, L.; Yun, J. Advancing Sustainability through Urban Green Space: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Equity, and Social Determinants of Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016,13, 196.
Okafor-Yarwood, I.; Kadagi, N.I.; Miranda, N.A.F.; Uku, J.; Elegbede, I.O.; Adewumi, I.J. The Blue Economy–Cultural Livelihood–Ecosystem Conservation Triangle: The African Experience. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020,7, 586.
Marino, D.; Mazzocchi, G.; Pellegrino, D.; Barucci, V. Integrated Multi-Level Assessment of Ecosystem Services (ES): The Case of the Casal del Marmo Agricultural Park Area in Rome (Italy). Land 2022,11, 2055.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








