Fabulating Archival Arts: An Exploration of the Complexities of Politics, History, and Memory in a Postmodern Context

Chenyi Wang

doi:10.62051/7nsbs810

Authors

Chenyi Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/7nsbs810

Keywords:

Archival Art; Post-modernism; Deconstruction; Critical Fabulation.

Abstract

Archival art, which emerged in the last century, has become a significant influence in the art world, challenging the constraints of traditional historical narratives. It offers viewers a more nuanced and inclusive framework for thinking, providing an alternative engagement with history free from dominant past narratives. This paper undertakes a comprehensive analysis of two significant archival artworks, namely the Atlas Group and Sputnik. Through this analysis, it aims to elucidate the societal impacts engendered by archival art that adopts critical fabulation as a strategy. Combining textual and graphic analyses with perspectives from postmodernism and deconstructionism, the research demonstrates that fictional archival art stimulates profound contemplation of the interconnectedness between the past, present, and future through artistic expression. It also examines the emotional impact of revisiting the past, records, and memory. By navigating the complexities and ambiguities of postmodern society through archival artistic expression, we can foster a more inspiring approach to understanding this art form.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alphen, Ernst Van. Staging the Archive: Art and Photography in the Age of New Media, Reaktion Books, London England, 2018, pp. 7.

Archival term for a gap in the historical record caused by the accidental or deliberate omission or distortion of documents in an archive. --“Archival Silence.” SAA Dictionary: archival silence. Accessed January 6, 2024. https:// dictionary.archivists.org/entry/archival-silence.html.

Artpress. “Joan Fontcuberta, Le Bénéfice Du Doute.” artpress, September 18, 2017. https://www. artpress. com/ 2017/ 02/23/joan-fontcuberta-le-benefice-du-doute/.

Davis, Natalie Zemon. Fiction in the archives: Pardon tales and their tellers in sixteenth-century France. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.

DERRIDA, JACQUES. Archive fever: A Freudian impression. UNIV OF CHICAGO Press, 2017.

Richards, K.M. and Chen, si (2016) in De Li da Yan Zhong de Yi Shu = Derrida. Chong qing: Chong qing da xue chu ban she, p. 19.

Foster, Hal. Bad New Days: Art, Criticism, Emergency, Verso, New York, 2017.

Foucault, M. “A Priori Knowledge of History and Archives.” Essay. In The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2002.

Hartman, Saidiya. “Venus in Two Acts.” Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism 12, no. 2 (2008): 1–14. https:// doi.org/10.1215/-12-2-1.

John Menick, “Imagined Testimonies: An Interview with Walid Raad” →. Originally published at bbs.thing.net, March 25, 2002.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The savage mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018.

Lyotard, Jean Francois. The postmodern condition. Minnesota, Minn: University of Minnesota, 1997.

Maurice Halbwachs, On Collective Memory, Lewis A. Coser (ed. and trans.), (Chicago, 1941, 1992), ch. 2, "Language and Memory", p. 43.

Narusevicius, Vytas. “Walid Raad’s Double Bind: The Atlas Group Project, 1989-2004.” RACAR: Revue d’art Canadienne / Canadian Art Review, vol. 39, no. 2, 2014, pp. 43–53. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43202467. Accessed 19 Dec. 2023.

Rancière, Jacques. “Is History a Form of Fiction?” Essay. In The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible, 38–38. London, UK: Continuum Intl Pub Group, 2004.

Sara Callahan, Art + Archive Understanding the Archival Turn in Contemporary Art, Manchester University Press,2022. Chapter 6.

Schwartz, Joan M., and Terry Cook. “Archives, Records, and Power: The Making of Modern Memory.” Archival Science 2, no. 1–2 (2002): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02435628.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, and Jacques Derrida. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.

White, Hayden V., and Michael S. Roth. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.