Judicial Judgment Standard of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Training Data from the Perspective of Fair Use

Authors

  • Zhenyi Gao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/2wk20c78

Keywords:

Text and Data Mining; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Fair Use.

Abstract

With the development of generative artificial intelligence, text and data mining has been put into more applications. However, as a technology for collecting and processing a large number of other works, it faces copyright infringement under the current legal system. As a step in the operation of artificial intelligence, text and data mining is to collect and process existing works and information to realize the behavior of knowledge "reproduction", thus promoting the utilization of knowledge and social innovation. Meanwhile, copyright exemption should be provided for its fair use system. The fair use system in the United States can give full play to the autonomy of judges in specific cases and flexibly identify fair use exemptions, while the copyright exception in Europe clarifies that text and data mining activities should be exempted under specific circumstances. Learning from both, China can not only break the closed fair use system, but also build an evaluation system of artificial intelligence infringement and benefit-sharing mechanism, so as to provide scientific norms for fair use and improve the development of artificial intelligence and big data industry in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jiang, Y. P. (2023). Application of data mining technology in network security. China CIO News, (05): 73-75.

Zhang, H. B. & Xiao, Q. X. (2021). The construction of copyright exemption rules for text and data mining in the era of artificial intelligence. Science Technology and Law (Chinese-English Version), (06): 74-84.

Beijing Internet Court. Civil Judgement. (2018) Jing 0491 Min Chu 239.

Civil Judgment of People's Court in Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province. (2019) Yue 0305 Min Chu 14010.

Wu, H. D. (2020). Fair Use System of Copyright. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 235-236, 312, 290.

Zhu, L. (2007). Whether temporary reproduction belongs to reproduction in the sense of copyright law—Normative analysis with international conventions as the core. Electronics Intellectual Property, (01): 4.

Hua, J. (2019). The dilemma and solution concerning application of copyright exceptions to artificial intelligence’s creation. Electronics Intellectual Property, (04): 29-39.

Zhang, H. B. & Xiao, Q. X. (2021). The construction of copyright exemption rules for text and data mining in the era of artificial intelligence. Science Technology and Law Chinese-English Version, (06): 74-84.

Wan, Y. & Li, Y. L. (2023). Research on the interpretation of fair use clause in response to the development of artificial intelligence industry. Digital Law, (03): 83-92.

Liu, S., Ren, J. D., Pi, Z. X. & Chen, Z. Y. (2023). Research on data mining technology based on AI technology under digital background—Comment on the principle and application of artificial intelligence and data mining. Chinese Sciencepaper, 18(06): 704.

Wu, G. & Huang, X. B. (2021). Study on the design of fair use rules for text and data mining in the age of artificial intelligence. Library and Information Service, 65(22): 3-13.

Yang, X. D. (2020). Research on the fair use of artificial intelligence editing. Science Technology and Law (Chinese-English Version), (01): 8-14.

Xuan, Z. (2021). On the fair use of copyright in artificial intelligence creation from the perspective of classified protection. Publishing Research, (04): 81-87.

Wan, Y. (2021). Dilemma and solution of fair use system of copyright law in the era of artificial intelligence. Social Science Journal, (05): 93-102.

Wan, Y. & Li, Y. L. (2023). Research on the interpretation of fair use clause in response to the development of artificial intelligence industry. Digital Law, (03): 83-92.

Beijing Internet Court. Civil Judgement. (2018) Jing 0491 Min Chu 239.

Civil Judgment of People's Court in Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province. (2019) Yue 0305 Min Chu 14010.

Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, inc. v. Goldsmith et al.

C-5/08 Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagbaldes Forening.

Qin, J. (2022). Research on internet fair use system under the background of innovation driven—Also on the revision proposal of Article 24 of the copyright law. Science Technology and Law (Chinese-English Version), (05): 76-84+122.

Diligena, D. & Song, X. T. (2022). The application of fair use in the judicial practice of copyright in China—Empirical analysis based on 113 litigation cases. Science Technology and Law (Chinese-English Version), (01): 109-117.

Beijing Internet Court. (2018). Civil Judgement. 0491(239).

Liu, S., Ren, J. D., Pi, Z. X. & Chen, Z. Y. (2023). Research on data mining technology based on AI technology under digital background—Comment on the principle and application of artificial intelligence and data mining. Chinese Sciencepaper, 18(06): 704.

Wang, Q. (2021). A Course in Intellectual Property Law (Seventh Edition). Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 284.

Lin, X. Q. (2021. Reshaping the fair use system in copyright law in the AI era. Chinese Journal of Law, 43(06), 170-185.

Yi, J. M. (2017). Is creation generated by artificial intelligence work? Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 35(05): 137-147.

Dong, K. Y. & Zhang, Y. Q. (2023). Philosophical reflection on the development and governance of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), (04): 48-63.

"Under special circumstances necessary to promote technological innovation and commercial development, considering factors such as the nature and purpose of the use behavior of the work, the nature of the used work, the quantity and quality of the used part, and the impact of the use on the potential market or value of the work, if the use behavior neither conflicts with the normal use of the work nor unreasonably damages the legitimate interests of the author, it can be regarded as fair use."

Notice of the State Council on Printing and Distributing the Development Plan of the New Generation. [2017]35.

Wu, H. D. (2020). Rethinking the copyright of works generated by artificial intelligence. Peking University Law Journal, 32(03): 653-673.

Hua, J. (2019). The dilemma and solution concerning application of copyright exceptions to artificial intelligence’s creation. Electronics Intellectual Property, (04): 29-39.

Wang, K. W. (2021). Artificial intelligence data input and fair use of copyright. Journal of Library and Data, 3(02): 110-118.

Liu, Y. H. & Wei, Y. S. (2019). The copyright infringement issue of machine learning and its solutions. ECUPL Journal, 22(02): 68-79.

See Krista Cox. (2015). Fair use in text and data mining: ARL publishes issue brief. Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from https://www.arl.org/news/fair-use-in-text-and- data-mining-arl-publishes-issue-brief/.

Wang, W. M. (2022). Challenge and response of artificial intelligence for the restriction and exception rules of copyrights. Journal of Law Application, (11): 152-162.

Sobe, L. B. (2018). Artificial intelligence's fair use crisis. Columbia Journal of Law & The Arts, (1): 45-97.

Zhou, L. L. (2017). Study on European Commission’s copyright exception for researchers and text and data mining. Library Development, (07): 19-24+30.

Zhang, Z. Y. & Zhou, L. (2015). The concept, method and development path of big data publishing. Publishing Research, (01): 14-17.

“Encourage the innovative application of generative artificial intelligence technology in various industries and fields … Support industry organizations, enterprises, educational and scientific research institutions, public cultural institutions and relevant professional institutions to cooperate in the innovation of generative artificial intelligence technology, data resource construction, transformation and application, risk prevention, etc.”

Gao, L. (2023). Inspection and reconstruction of copyright reasonable use system in the digital age: Theoretical analysis based on technology neutrality. Journal of Soochow University (Law Edition), 10(01): 41-52.

Civil Judgment of People's Court in Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province. (2019) Yue 0305 Min Chu 14010.

Tang, S. H. (2017). Research on copyright exceptions of text and data mining in data environment from the perspective of EU DSM copyright directive proposal. Intellectual Property, (10): 109-116.

Wan, Y. & Li, Y. L. (2023). Research on the interpretation of fair use clause in response to the development of artificial intelligence industry. Digital Law, (03): 83-92.

Cao, W. (2023). Humanistic logic and legal analysis of artificial intelligence from the perspective of technological iteration. Renmin University Law Review, (01): 104-124.

Li, D. S. (2021). Legal Construction of Digital Publishing in China from the Perspective of Intellectual Property Protection. Intellectual Property Publishing House.

Shao, H. H. (2023). Copyright algorithmic fair use: Necessity, possibility and limitation. Law and Economy, (04): 149-164.

Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. 593 U.S.

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569.

Rosati, E. (2019). Copyright as an obstacle or an enabler? A European perspective on text and data mining and its role in the development of AI creativity. Asia Pacific Law Review, (2):198-217.

Google Spain SL & Google Inc v. Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) & Costeja Gonzalez, C 131/12.

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Facebook., 3:15-cv-03747.

The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202, 2nd Cir. (N. Y.), Oct. 16, 2013.

Xiong, Q. (2019). Transformative use interpretation in China copyright law. The Jurist, (02): 124-134+195.

Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. 593 U.S.

Jiang, K. (2015). “Conduct” in fair use stage. Law Review, 33(06): 185-193.

Li, S. & Yang, Q. (2023). Can Turing machines pass Turing test? --From the perspective of the material theory of induction. Chinese Journal of System Science, (02): 28-32.

Downloads

Published

06-05-2024

How to Cite

Gao, Z. (2024). Judicial Judgment Standard of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Training Data from the Perspective of Fair Use. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 7, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.62051/2wk20c78