An Exploration of Changes in British Welfare Social Policy in the First Half of the Twentieth Century through Bourdieu's Theory of Field and Habitus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/7zr2nc54Keywords:
British Welfare; Social Policy; Bourdieu's Theory; Field and Habitus.Abstract
The question of how to transcend the dichotomy between subjectivity and objectivity is a central one in contemporary sociological theory. Bourdieu advocates habitus as a cognitive framework that embodies an individual's practical understanding of society. Such practices consist of structures and habits, and social behaviour is not directly determined by structures, but is indirectly influenced by habitus as an 'embodied mode'. Habits, as 'opportunities for the subject', act as constraints on the formation of structures and contribute to their reproduction. The welfare policy of Britain has experienced the transformation from solving the problem of the poor with a single welfare policy of relief law to the establishment of national economic law, which is continuously amended according to the native welfare policy habitus, thus affecting the welfare policy field and realising the two-way constraints of the field and habitus.
Downloads
References
Baert, P., & Da Silva, F. C. (2010). Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond. Polity.
Beveridge, W. (1942). Social insurance and allied services (Vol. 942). HMSO: London.
Bourdieu, & Nice, Richard translator. (1992). The logic of practice / Pierre Bourdieu; translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Boyer, G. R. (2018). The winding road to the welfare state: Economic insecurity and social welfare policy in Britain. Princeton University Press.
Brundage, A. (2002). The English poor laws, 1700-1930 (p. 151). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Chin, T. (1992). The Beveridge Report and the Development of British Social Security. Journal of Social Science and Philosophy, 81(11), 321-382.
Croll, A. (2013). Strikers and the Right to Poor Relief in Late Victorian Britain: The Making of the Merthyr Tydfil Judgment of 1900. Journal of British Studies, 52(1), 128-152. doi:10.1017/jbr.2012.61
Cronin, J. E., & Weiler, P. (1991). Working-Class Interests and the Politics of Social Democratic Reform in Britain, 1900–1940. International Labor and Working-Class History, 40, 47-66.
Ding, J. D.. (2002). The British State Pension System and its Implications. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) (03),.
Lees, L. H. (1998). The solidarities of strangers: The English poor laws and the people, 1700-1948. Cambridge University Press.
Li, Hong Yang. (2015). From Social Assistance to National Welfare Master's Thesis, Heilongjiang University
Qian, N. (2005). History of Modern Social Welfare Thought (2nd ed., Vol. 169).
Thane, P. (2011). The making of National Insurance, 1911. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19(3), 211-219. Retrieved Nov 20, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1332/096278911X582651.
Whiteside, N. (2014). The Beveridge Report and its implementation: a revolutionary project?. Histoire@ Politique, (24), 24-37.
Whiteside, N. (2015). Who were the unemployed? Conventions, classifications and social security law in Britain (1911-1934). Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 150-169.
Zhu, Weijue. (2005). Beyond the subject-object dichotomy - Bourdieu's sociological epistemology and his concept of "habitus". Zhejiang Journal (03).
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
