Research on The Development and Integration of Chinese Ancient Architecture in Modern Urban Planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/tph8m082Keywords:
Urban planning; ancient architecture; Chinese architecture.Abstract
This paper studies and analyzes the development cases of ancient buildings in different historical backgrounds. It mainly compares the Beijing City Wall which was destroyed with The Dujiangyan Water Conservancy Project and Beijing-Hangzhou Grand, which are protected and sustainably developed in modern society Canal reflects the development and integration of ancient Chinese architecture in urban planning. The study explores how to promote sustainable development policies while preserving and utilizing ancient buildings, through the combination of modern technology and traditional architecture, to achieve the inheritance and innovation of cultural heritage in the city. The study pointed out that through reasonable protection and renovation, ancient buildings can not only preserve the historical culture of the city but also bring economic and social benefits to the city through innovative design. Several cases of positive and negative impacts are mentioned in the paper, which is a valuable experience and lesson for other relics and ancient buildings. In addition, the paper further points out the future difficulties in the development and integration of Chinese ancient architecture in urban planning and will continue to explore how to realize the transformation of modern functions of historical buildings based on cultural inheritance, to actively shape the future development direction of the city.
Downloads
References
[1] W. Jin, "The historical development of Chinese urban morphology," Planning Perspective, vol. 8, no. 1, 1993, pp. 20-52.
[2] Y. Liu, K. Dupre, and X. Jin, "Dalian’s urban planning and design in evolution," Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, vol. 3, no. 1, 2021, p. 1024.
[3] K. Peng, "People's Wall: reconstructing a new city wall for the modern city of Beijing," Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2017.
[4] G. Lang, S. Chan, and L. Ragvald, "Temples and the religious economy," in State, market, and religions in Chinese societies, Brill, 2005, pp. 149-180.
[5] H. Weishan, "Urban restructuring and temple agency—A case study of the Jing’an Temple," in Buddhism after Mao: Negotiations, Continuities, and Reinventions, 2019, pp. 251-270.
[6] X. Huang, J. You, P. Yang, and X. Chai, "Development of Chengdu and sustainable utilization of the ancient Dujiangyan Water-Conservancy Project," Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, vol. 368, 2015, pp. 356-360.
[7] M. Chen, J. Wang, J. Sun, F. Ye, and H. Zhang, "Spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of intangible cultural heritage and tourism response in the Beijing–Hangzhou Grand Canal basin in China," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 13, 2023, p. 10348.
[8] J. Jin, "Re-envisioning the Third Place: reconnecting spatial networks in the historic urban landscape," 2020.
[9] D. Luo and P. Rodloytuk, "The Etiquette Ethics of the Architectural Art of the Forbidden City," Res Militaris, vol. 12, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1885-1897.
[10] C. Liu, "An urbanism theory for Chengdu: criteria towards advancing an alternative urban development model for central Chinese cities," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2014.
[11] L. Kealy and S. F. Musso, Eds., Conservation/transformation, Leuven, Belgium: EAAE, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.