Conflict and Coexistence of Natural Resource Exploitation and Ancient Monument Group Conservation - Exploration of the Path of Sustainable Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/kkzhn460Keywords:
Ancient Monument Group Conservation; Natural Resource.Abstract
The article reviewed several impacts of conflicts between resources exploitation and heritage protection in worldwide. Infrastructure construction as a major project for developing countries with poor heritage exploration might directly expose the archeological heritage under atmosphere, and lead to severe oxidization. Fossil fuel factories will release sulfur dioxide and nitroxide into the air, and following acid deposition will harm the surrounding heritages made with marbles or wood and cost high repairing fee for the government. The destruction of minority’s heritages by mining projects also happened around the world, which brings up concerns of minority rights lost and poor supervision to the companies. The unbalanced economic growth has result to the illegal deeds like stolen or looting frequently happened in developing countries with relatively poor checking, and lead to many valuable artifacts are traded in the black markets. With plenty of concerns and difficulties in applying heritage protections, the paper has stated the potential direction for solution, which involved a long-term cooperation between local government and international archeology organization through public education to complete legislation.
Downloads
References
[1] Micle D. Archaeological heritage between natural hazard and anthropic destruction: the negative impact of social non-involvement in the protection of archaeological sites[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 163: 269-278.
[2] Bernard M C, Joiret S. Understanding corrosion of ancient metals for the conservation of cultural heritage[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 54(22): 5199-5205.
[3] Mackenzie S, Yates D. Crime, corruption, and collateral damage: Large infrastructure projects as a threat to cultural heritage[M]//Organized Crime and Corruption Across Borders. Routledge, 2019: 99-113.
[4] Bravo H, Soto A R, Sosa E R, et al. Acid deposition effects on archeological monuments in Mexico[C]//13th World Clean Air and Environmental Protection Congress. August. 2004: 22-27.
[5] Castillo-Miranda J O, Torres-Jardón R, García-Reynoso J A, et al. Mapping recession risk for cultural heritage stone in Mexico City due to dry and wet deposition of urban air pollutants[J]. Atmósfera, 2017, 30(3): 189-207.
[6] Marchetti N, Curci A, Gatto M C, et al. A multi-scalar approach for assessing the impact of dams on the cultural heritage in the Middle East and North Africa[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2019, 37: 17-28.
[7] Huisman D J, Manders M R, Kretschmar E I, et al. Burial conditions and wood degradation at archaeological sites in the Netherlands[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2008, 61(1): 33-44.
[8] Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R, Koirala S, et al. Global flood risk under climate change[J]. Nature climate change, 2013, 3(9): 816-821.
[9] Mehta P. Science behind acid rain: analysis of its impacts and advantages on life and heritage structures[J]. south Asian journal of tourism and heritage, 2010, 3(2): 123-132.
[10] Wahlquist C. Rio Tinto blames' misunderstanding'for destruction of 46,000-year-old Aboriginal site[J]. The Guardian, 2020.
[11] XU Dawei. New Tomb Raiders: The Transformation of an Ancient Trade[J]. China Newsweek,2020,000(40):P.14-23
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







