Optimizing Self-Assembly in Lattice Systems through Simulated Annealing: A Study of Cooling Strategies and Interaction Energies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/822xe675Keywords:
Agent-based simulation; simulated annealing; cooling strategy; interaction energy.Abstract
The self-assembly is modeled by lattices containing three units of cell agents as molecules. This paper studies how various cooling strategies, including interaction parameters, act on the self- assembly of a lattice system containing three-unit cell agents of varying configurations. The self- organization is governed by attractive or repulsive forces between constituents and is a common driver of many natural processes, from the making of biological structures to that of nano-materials. This paper aims to find the energy minima using three cooling strategies: proportional, logarithmic, and exponential. The effect of interaction parameters on the system’s behavior using interactions between different agent types, positive, negative, and neutral, is studied. Simulated annealing is used in simulations to find the energy reduction and clustering behavior. The results are analyzed utilizing heat maps, energy change calculations, and the overall system organization. The cluster movements ensure that local minima are avoided. The results obtained give insight into the relationship between cooling strategies and interaction parameters on the emergent properties of the lattice system.
Downloads
References
[1] Barz, B., Urbanc, B. Minimal Model of Self-Assembly: Emergence of diversity and complexity. the Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, 2004, 118 (14): 3761–3770.
[2] Troisi A, Wong V, Ratner MA. An agent-based approach for modeling molecular self-organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005, 102 (2): 255-60.
[3] Israelachvili JN, Mitchell DJ, Ninham BW. Theory of self-assembly of hydrocarbon amphiphiles into micelles and bilayers. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2: Molecular and Chemical Physics. 1976, 72: 1525-68.
[4] Whitesides GM, Kriebel JK, Mayers BT. Self-assembly and nanostructured materials. Nanoscale Assembly: Chemical Techniques. 2005, 217-39.
[5] Kirkpatrick S. Improvement of reliabilities of regulations using a hierarchical structure in a genetic network. Science. 1983, 220: 671-80.
[6] Philp D, Stoddart JF. Self‐assembly in natural and unnatural systems. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 1996, 35 (11): 1154-96.
[7] Whitesides GM, Grzybowski B. Self-assembly at all scales. Science. 2002, 295 (5564): 2418-21.
[8] Fortuna S, Troisi A. An artificial intelligence approach for modeling molecular self-assembly: agent-based simulations of rigid molecules. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2009, 113 (29): 9877-85.
[9] Mézard M, Parisi G, Virasoro MA. Spin glass theory and beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications. World Scientific Publishing Company; 1987 Nov 1.
[10] Isakov SV, Zintchenko IN, Rønnow TF, Troyer M. Optimised simulated annealing for Ising spin glasses. Computer Physics Communications. 2015, 192: 265-71.
[11] Kirkpatrick S. Improvement of reliabilities of regulations using a hierarchical structure in a genetic network. Science. 1983, 220: 671-80.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.