Digital Archaeology: A Review of the Application of Information Technology in Archaeological Data Management and Analysis

Kezhen Xu

doi:10.62051/dwtdzk11

Authors

Kezhen Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/dwtdzk11

Keywords:

Digital Archaeology; Information Technology in Archaeology; Geographic Information System (GIS).

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current application of information technology in archaeological data management and analysis, discusses the progress and practical application of digital archaeology, and looks ahead to its future development directions and challenges. With the rapid development of information technology, archaeology has gradually introduced digital tools such as database management systems, geographic information systems (GIS), remote sensing technology, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR). These technologies not only improve the efficiency of data management but also offer entirely new methods for analysis and presentation in archaeological research. This paper evaluates the application of different digital tools in archaeology, analyzes their technical advantages and limitations, and proposes strategies to address issues related to technical complexity, data standardization, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The study aims to provide valuable references for archaeologists, technology developers, and cultural heritage conservation professionals, promoting the further development and application of digital archaeology to achieve the efficient preservation and dissemination of cultural heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] LIU Han. Discussion on the combination of scientific and technological archaeology and traditional archaeological methods [J]. Yanhuang Geography, 2022 (8): 83 - 85.

[2] Huggett, J. (2017). The apparatus of digital archaeology. Internet archaeology, 44.

[3] Huggett, J. (2015). A manifesto for an introspective digital archaeology. Open archaeology, 1 (1).

[4] Averett, E. W., Counts, D., & Gordon, J. (2016). Mobilizing the past for a digital future: the potential of digital archaeology.

[5] Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., Milosz, M., Powroznik, P., & Lukasik, E. (2022). 3D technologies for intangible cultural heritage preservation—literature review for selected databases. Heritage Science, 10 (1), 3.

[6] Liu J G. (2007). Theory and practice of digital archaeology. Southern Cultural Relics (01), 2 - 8+141.

[7] Ross, S., Sobotkova, A., Ballsun-Stanton, B., & Crook, P. (2013). Creating eresearch tools for archaeologists: The federated archaeological information management systems project. Australian Archaeology, 77 (1), 107 - 119.

[8] Menéndez-Marsh, F., Al-Rawi, M., Fonte, J., Dias, R., Gonçalves, L. J., Seco, L. G., ... & Neves, A. (2023). Geographic Information Systems in Archaeology: A Systematic Review. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 6 (1).

[9] Zhang H Q. (2011). Relational database and NoSQL database. Computer Knowledge and Technology (20), 4802 - 4804.

[10] Opitz, R., & Herrmann, J. (2018). Recent trends and long-standing problems in archaeological remote sensing. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1 (1), 19 - 41.

[11] Schindling, J., & Gibbes, C. (2014). LiDAR as a tool for archaeological research: a case study. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 6, 411 - 423.

[12] Argyrou, A., & Agapiou, A. (2022). A review of artificial intelligence and remote sensing for archaeological research. Remote Sensing, 14 (23), 6000.

[13] Pettitt, A., & Fuhrmann, S. (2019, July). Modern Archeological Mapping: Towards Immersive VR Use in Archeology. In Proceedings of the ICA (Vol. 2, p. 99). Göttingen, Germany: Copernicus Publications.

[14] Richardson, L. J. (2018). Ethical challenges in digital public archaeology. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1 (1), 64 - 73.

[15] Huggett, J., Reilly, P., & Lock, G. (2018). Whither digital archaeological knowledge? The challenge of unstable futures. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1 (1), 42 - 54.

[16] Marwick, B. (2017). Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: Basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24 (2), 424 - 450.