Prediction of pm2.5 concentration based on VMD-CNN-Transformer hybrid model

Authors

  • Xinjie Wang
  • Changsheng Zheng
  • Ziyang Zheng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/6d9ed071

Keywords:

Prediction of pm2.5 concentration; VMD-CNN-Transformer; Comparison Experiment.

Abstract

In recent years, PM2.5 pollution has become increasingly serious, seriously affecting people's health and the world's ecological environment, and it has important research significance for the accurate prediction of PM2.5 concentration. In this paper, a VMD-CNN-Transformer hybrid model is proposed to predict future pm2.5 concentration. Firstly, the sliding window method is used to reconstruct the data set, and the required historical data range is set according to the window size. The research shows that the model has the best performance when the window size is 6. Secondly, the ablation experiment shows that the VMD module can enhance the predictive performance of the model. The test set is used to test the VMD-CNN-Transformer hybrid model, and the comparison experiment is conducted with the comparison model (LSTM, random forest). The results show that in terms of MAE, RMSE and determination coefficient, the Transformer model can be improved. The VMD-CNN-Transformer hybrid model can predict pm2.5 concentration better than the comparison model, with a determination coefficient of 0.97. Therefore, this study aims to improve the prediction of PM2.5 concentration, which is of great significance for controlling air pollution and solving health problems, and provides a scientific basis for related policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wang S, Kaur M, Li T, et al. Effect of different pollution parameters and chemical components of PM2. 5 on health of residents of **nxiang City, China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18 (13): 6821.

[2] Zhang L, Lin J, Qiu R, et al. Trend analysis and forecast of PM2. 5 in Fuzhou, China using the ARIMA model [J]. Ecological indicators, 2018, 95: 702 - 710.

[3] Kang J, Zou X, Tan J, et al. Short-Term PM2. 5 concentration changes prediction: a comparison of meteorological and historical data [J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15 (14): 11408.

[4] Liang Y, Ma J, Tang C, et al. Hourly forecasting on PM2. 5 concentrations using a deep neural network with meteorology inputs [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195 (12): 1510.

[5] Xu X, Tong T, Zhang W, et al. Fine-grained prediction of PM2. 5 concentrations based on multisource data and deep learning [J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2020, 11 (10): 1728 - 1737.

[6] Zhang J, Peng Y, Ren B, et al. Pm2. 5 concentration prediction based on cnn-bilstm and attention mechanism[J]. Algorithms, 2021, 14 (7): 208.

[7] Qin C, Huang G, Yu H, et al. Adaptive VMD and multi-stage stabilized transformer-based long-distance forecasting for multiple shield machine tunneling parameters [J]. Automation in Construction, 2024, 165: 105563.

[8] Zhang Z, Zhang S. Modeling air quality PM2. 5 forecasting using deep sparse attention-based transformer networks [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 (12): 13535 - 13550.

[9] Kristiani E, Lin H, Lin J R, et al. Short-term prediction of PM2. 5 using LSTM deep learning methods [J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14 (4): 2068.

[10] Chen M, Bai J, Zhu S, et al. The influence of neighborhood-level urban morphology on PM2. 5 variations based on random forest regression [J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2021, 12 (8): 101147.

Downloads

Published

26-11-2024

How to Cite

Wang, X., Zheng, C. and Zheng, Z. (2024) “Prediction of pm2.5 concentration based on VMD-CNN-Transformer hybrid model”, Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences, 3, pp. 73–85. doi:10.62051/6d9ed071.