Fuzzy logic and multi-objective optimization-based water level regulation model for the Great Lakes of North America

Authors

  • Xinyi Huang
  • Hugen Lv
  • Junlei Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/5ex7qg89

Keywords:

Multi-objective Programming; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Dynamic System Simulation.

Abstract

In this study, a series of models was developed to ascertain and maintain the optimal water levels of the Great Lakes, aiming to reconcile the diverse requirements of stakeholders. Initially, a fuzzy logic algorithm was applied to calculate the weighting coefficients of five stakeholder categories, facilitating the creation of a multi-objective optimization framework to harmonize all demands and thereby determine the optimal water level for each lake. Subsequently, an analysis of the geographical and meteorological data of the Great Lakes informed the construction of a dynamic equilibrium model for water levels, grounded in the calculation of influx and efflux rates to sustain the optimal water level. Following this, simulated tests were conducted using historical data, with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) utilized to assess the model’s pre-optimization and post-optimization, providing a clear comparison of outcomes. This article aims to develop and apply optimization models to balance the diverse needs of stakeholders in the Great Lakes, manage water levels scientifically, enhance water resource management efficiency, and promote regional sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Kayastha Miraj B., Ye Xinyu, Huang Chenfu, Xue Pengfei. Future Rise of the Great Lakes Water Levels under Climate Change [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 612 (B): 128205.

[2] Zhu, S., Lu, H., Ptak, M. et al. Lake Water-Level Fluctuation Forecasting Using Machine Learning Models: A Systematic Review [J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27, 44807 – 44819.

[3] Fagherazzi, L., Fay, D. and Salas, J. ‘Synthetic Hydrology and Climate Change Scenarios to Improve Multi-Purpose Complex Water Resource Systems Management. The Lake Ontario: St Lawrence River Study of the International Canada and US Joint Commission’ [J] Water Resources Management IV, 2007, 163 – 177.

[4] Fry, L.M., Apps, D. and Gronewold, A.D. ‘Operational Seasonal Water Supply and Water Level Forecasting for the La Urentian Great Lakes' [J] Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2020, 146 (9).

[5] Gronewold, A.D. et al. ‘Coasts, Water Levels, and Climate Change: A Great Lakes Perspective’, Climatic Change[J], 2019, 12 0 (4), 697 - 711.

[6] Murty, P. S., Pandey, A., & Suryavanshi, S. Application of Semi‐Distributed Hydrological Model for Basin Level Water Balance of the Ken Basin of Central India. [J] Hydrological Processes, 2014 28 (13), 4119 – 4129.

[7] Sun, Z. Research on PID Control of Water Level in Pile Legs Based on Improved PSO. IOP [J] Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 558 (2), 22019.

[8] Moeini, M., Zahraie, B., & Sadeghi, F. Developing a New Lumped Monthly Water Balance Model for Estimating Groundwater Level and Runoff Volume. [J] Sustainable Water Resources Management, 2024, 10 (3), 113.

[9] Lever, J., Krzywinski, M. & Altman, N. ‘Principal Component analysis’, [J] Nat Methods, 2017,14, 641 – 642.

[10] Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. Principal component analysis. [J] Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2020, 2 (4), 433 - 459.

Downloads

Published

26-11-2024

How to Cite

Huang, X., Lv, H. and Zhang, J. (2024) “Fuzzy logic and multi-objective optimization-based water level regulation model for the Great Lakes of North America”, Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences, 3, pp. 32–39. doi:10.62051/5ex7qg89.