Research on the Differences between the Securities Markets of China and the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/88q2bf13Keywords:
Securities Funds Comparison; Market Development; Regulatory System; Investor Structure; Market Outlook.Abstract
This article aims to analyze the current development status and differences of the securities and fund industries in China and the United States and explore the reasons for the Chinese government's reduced attention to securitization. The article first emphasizes the importance of securities funds in modern financial markets, pointing out the leading position of US mutual funds in the global mutual fund industry, as well as the rapid development of Chinese securities funds in recent years. The article reviews the current research status related to securitization, pointing out the development of securitization markets in China and the United States, as well as the importance of securitization in disposing of non-performing assets and complying with Chinese government policies. At the same time, the article also summarizes the legal deficiencies of the Chinese government in taxation, credit rating, and enhancement issues, and suggests improving the transparency of relevant securities information and establishing a unified trading execution system. When comparing the development of the fund industry between China and the United States, the article found that there are differences and similarities in investment strategies, government roles, and financial regulatory agency functions between the two countries. The article also explores the differences in the size, investor structure, and valuation levels of the securities markets in the United States and China, and analyzes the main reasons for market development history, regulatory system and legal environment, and market participant structure.
Downloads
References
[1] Ross, R. Chinese Security Policy: Structure, Power and Politics (1st ed.). Routledge. (2009).
[2] Berkman, Henk; Cole, Rebel A.; Fu, Lawrence J. Political Connections and Minority-Shareholder Protection: Evidence from Securities-Market Regulation in China. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45 (6), 1391–1417 (2010).
[3] Zeng, James Si. The faces of securities regulation and state authority: A comparison between the United States and China. American Business Law Journal 59 (03): 559-607 (2022).
[4] Li, Gen. Comparison of China US securities markets.102-104 (2024).
[5] Hua, Renhai. Comparison and Implications of Securities Market Regulatory Systems between China and the United States Journal of Southeast University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 3 (4), 4 (2001).
[6] Albulescu, C. T. COVID-19 and the United States financial markets’ volatility. Finance research letters, 38, 101699 (2021).
[7] Zeng, J. S. The faces of securities regulation and state authority: A comparison between the United States and China. American Business Law Journal, 59 (3), 559-607 (2022).
[8] Wei, Y. The development of the securities market and regulation in China. Loy. LA Int'l & Comp. L. Rev., 27, 479 (2005).
[9] Zhang, J. Z. Securities Markets and Securities Regulation in China. NCJ Int'l L. & Com. Reg., 22, 557 (1996).
[10] Zhiwu, C. Capital markets and legal development: The China case. China Economic Review, 14 (4), 451-472 (2003).
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.