The Evaluation of Three Companies of General Motors, Procter & Gamble, and Colgate-Palmolive

Authors

  • Yuhao Lu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/x90txe56

Keywords:

Risks; Profitability; Market values.

Abstract

The article focuses on the risk-return analysis of companies from different industries, including Car Manufacturing and FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods). By using risk-return analysis in various corporates, investors could enhance their understandings on market dynamics, identifying investment opportunities, spreading risks in order to make more rational investment choices. This analysis helps investors to improve their returns and reduce risks. This research collects various indices, including risk targets (market betas, debt and current ratios, investment ratings), profitability measures (total asset turnover, profit margin, return on assets, return on equity), and market ratios (PB ratio, PE ratio, PEG ratio, dividend yield, current stock price, and 200-day moving average). The findings indicate why different types of investors, including value, PEG, index, valuation, and momentum investors might choose companies like General Motors, Procter & Gamble, and Colgate-Palmolive. Finally, the paper aims to enhance understanding of industry dynamics, corporate behavior, and provide investment advice. Besides, this could be useful to serve as a valuable resource for novice investors and future research discussions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] J. Lark. ISO 31000: Risk management – A practical guide for SMEs. Switzerland: ISO. (2015).

[2] R. Ahmeti, B. Vladi. Risk management in public sector: A literature review. European journal of multidisciplinary studies. 2 (2017) 190-196.

[3] F. Black, M. C. Jensen, M. Scholes, M. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests. (1972).

[4] J. D. Coval, J. Jurek, E. Stafford. The pricing of investment grade credit risk during the financial crisis. Harvard Business School. (2009).

[5] E. I. Altman. FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY. The Journal of Finance. 23 (1968) 589–609.

[6] A. Demirgüç-Kunt, H. Huizinga. Determinants of Commercial Bank Interest Margins and Profitability: Some International Evidence. In World Bank policy research working paper. (1999).

[7] F. A. Almaqtari, E. A. Al‐Homaidi, M. I. Tabash, N. H. Farhan. The determinants of profitability of Indian commercial banks: A panel data approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 24 (2018) 168–185.

[8] J. Bistrova, N. Lace. RELEVANCE OF FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS ON THE BALTIC EQUITY MARKET. Deleted Journal. 14 (2009) 132–137.

[9] S. C. Myers. The Capital Structure Puzzle. The Journal of Finance. 39 (1984) 574–592.

[10] R. C. Stapleton, R. Brealey, S. Myers. Principles of Corporate Finance. The Journal of Finance. 36 (1981) 982.

[11] H. Bessembinder, K. Chan. Market Efficiency and the Returns to Technical Analysis. Financial Management. 27 (1998) 5.

[12] L. J. Prather, T. H. Chu, M. I. Mazumder, J. C. Topuz. Index Funds or ETFs: The Case of the S&P 500 for Individual Investors. Financial Services Review. 18 (2009) 213.

Downloads

Published

23-12-2024

How to Cite

Lu, Y. (2024). The Evaluation of Three Companies of General Motors, Procter & Gamble, and Colgate-Palmolive. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 14, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.62051/x90txe56