Analysis of The Relationship Between Financial Fraud Losses and Market Factors

Authors

  • Xinwei Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/pdxtcs03

Keywords:

Financial Fraud losses, Market Factors, relationship.

Abstract

As digital financial services continue to expand, so too does the complexity of financial fraud schemes, affecting both individuals and large corporations. Despite economic growth and increased government attention, the incidence of fraud has not significantly decreased. This study, informed by the Agency Theory of Michael Jensen and William Meckling and Keynesian Economics, investigates the relationship between financial fraud amounts and key market factors such as market volatility, regulatory strength, economic environment, GDP growth rate, and unemployment rate. Through a quantitative analysis of historical data, the study aims to understand how these factors influence the occurrence and scale of financial fraud. Preliminary results indicate a significant correlation only with regulatory strength, suggesting that robust regulatory measures may be crucial in combating fraud. However, the absence of strong correlations with other factors hints at a more complex interplay that warrants further exploration, indicating the need for a nuanced understanding of the dynamics at play in financial fraud.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wells, J. T. Principles of Fraud Examination[M]. Wiley, 2014. [2024-08-19]. Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Principles+of+Fraud+Examination,+4th+Edition-p-9781118922347.

[2] Nasdaq. Nasdaq 2024 Global Financial Crime Report[R]. New York: Nasdaq, 2024. [2024-08-21]. Available at: https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1711973384569.pdf.

[3] Yang Yiming. The Bureau of Financial Consumer Rights and Interests of the State Financial Regulatory Administration is vigilant against new telecom network fraud such as "screen sharing" and "AI face onomatoid" [N]. Rural financial times, 2024-08-05 (A03.).

[4] International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Standards and Global Cooperation: FATF Recommendations[R/OL]. 2022. [2024-08-21]. Available: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf.

[5] European Union. EU Anti-Fraud Action Plan: The OLAF Report 2022[R/OL]. 2022. [2024-08-21]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/olaf-report/2022/anti-fraud/anti-fraud_en.html.

[6] Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). SEC Adopts Rules on Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure by Public Companies[R/OL]. 2023. [2024-08-22]. Available: https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023-139.

[7] Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). Report to the Nations: 2024 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse[R/OL]. 2024. [2024-08-22]. Available: https://legacy.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2024/

[8] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure[J/OL]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976. [2024-08-23]. Available: https://josephmahoney.web.illinois.edu/BA549_Fall%202010/Session%205/Jensen_Meckling%20(1976).pdf

[9] Keynes, J. M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money[M/OL]. Macmillan, 1936. [2024-09-02]. Available: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/125515/1366_KeynesTheoryofEmployment.pdf.

[10] Cressey, D. R. Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement[M/OL]. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1953. [2024-09-02]. Available: https://archive.org/details/otherpeoplesmone0000cres/page/n211/mode/2up?q=fraud+triangle.

Downloads

Published

23-12-2024

How to Cite

Liu, X. (2024). Analysis of The Relationship Between Financial Fraud Losses and Market Factors. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 14, 131-136. https://doi.org/10.62051/pdxtcs03