Comparative Study of Financing Channels for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Authors

  • Zhiming Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/k3cf3z32

Keywords:

Small and medium-sized enterprise (SMEs); financing channels; bank loans; venture capital; equity financing.

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are key to economic growth and job creation. However, they face significant challenges in accessing funding, which is essential for their growth and sustainable development. This paper analyzes several financing methods that can be adopted by SMEs in China, including bank loan, venture capital, angel investment, crowd funding, government grants, equity financing etc. The report evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of each pathway, focusing on accessibility, cost, approval process, etc. On this basis, combined with the actual situation of listed companies in China, the analysis of different types of financing models, to provide theoretical basis for the development of SMEs in China. In addition, the report also explores the financing of SMEs in the future, highlighting the use of technology, changes in government policies, and international collaboration that can improve SMEs' financing capacity. Understanding this new development trend is that SMEs should adopt flexible financing strategies according to changes in the market environment, so as to ensure their sustainable development and make a greater contribution to the world economy. These results will provide theoretical basis for the rapid development of Chinese SMEs in the financing environment, as well as the formulation of related policies and the decision-making of investors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hillary R. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment: Business Imperatives. Routledge, 2017.

[2] Erdin C, Ozkaya G. Contribution of small and medium enterprises to economic development and quality of life in Turkey. Heliyon, 2020, 6: e03215.

[3] Zanon L G, Marcelloni F, Gerolamo M C, Ribeiro C L C. Exploring the relations between supply chain performance and organizational culture: A fuzzy grey group decision model. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021, 233: 108023.

[4] Zakaria R H, Jamil I K, Othman A. An evalution of financing without collateral to small and medum enterprises in Malaysia: a concepture framework. Academic Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2019, 3: 1–19.

[5] DeZoort F T, Wilkins A, Justice S E. The effect of SME reporting framework and credit risk on lenders’ judgments and decisions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2017, 36: 302–315.

[6] Shihadeh F, Naradda G S K, Hannoon A M T. The causal relationship between SME sustainability and banks’ risk. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2019, 32: 2743–2760.

[7] Wang R, Lin Z, Luo H. Blockchain, bank credit and SME financing. Qual Quant, 2019, 53: 1127–1140.

[8] Djalic I, Terzic S, Novarlic B. The role of venture capital in the development of the SME sector. Eur J Appl Econ, 2017, 14: 58–69.

[9] Zhou L J, Zhang X, Sha Y. The role of angel investment for technology-based SMEs: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2021, 67: 101540.

[10] Eldridge D, Nisar T M, Torchia M. What impact does equity crowdfunding have on SME innovation and growth? An empirical study. Small Bus Econ, 2021, 56: 105–120.

[11] Quintiliani A. SME Growth: The Role of Government Grant. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 2017, 9: 307.

[12] Beck T. Financing Constraints of SMEs in Developing Countries: Evidence, Determinants and Solutions, 2018.

Downloads

Published

23-12-2024

How to Cite

Wang, Z. (2024). Comparative Study of Financing Channels for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 14, 30-34. https://doi.org/10.62051/k3cf3z32