Taxation Can Significantly Enhance The Effectiveness of Reward and Punishment Mechanisms in The N-Person Snowdrift Game

Authors

  • Yihao Liu
  • Xinsheng Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/nqkdp498

Keywords:

Cooperation; Evolutionary game theory; NSG; reward; punishment.

Abstract

We extend the reward and punishment mechanisms in the N-person evolutionary snowdrift game (NSG) model by constructing a tax-based pure punishment NSG model and a tax-based pure reward NSG model. Using replicator dynamics, we established two sets of dynamic equations that describe the evolution of the frequencies of the three strategies. Over longer time scales, both systems exhibit stable states involving two strategies, with the exclusion of the third. Introducing tax factors into the reward and punishment mechanisms significantly increases the proportion of cooperators in the steady state and eliminates defectors, with the time to reach the steady state depending on the tax rate. Moreover, we found that tax-based pure reward strategies are more conducive to fostering cooperative behavior within the system compared to tax-based pure punishment strategies. We employed numerical algorithms to simulate the replicator dynamics, and the results of the dynamic equations were in perfect agreement with the numerical simulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M.A. Nowak, Evolving cooperation, J. Theor. Biol. 299 (2012) 1–8.

[2] D.G. Rand, M.A. Nowak, Human cooperation, Trends Cogn. Sci. 17 (2013) 413–425.

[3] M. Perc, J.J. Jordan, D.G. Rand, Z. Wang, S. Boccaletti, A. Szolnoki, Statistical physics of human cooperation, Phys. Rep. 687 (2017) 1–51.

[4] A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, Impact of critical mass on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games, Phys. Rev. E 81 (2010) 057101.

[5] Y. Zhang, F. Fu, X. Chen, G. Xie, L. Wang, Cooperation in group-structured populations with two layers of interactions, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 17446.

[6] X. Chen, F. Fu, L. Wang, Influence of different initial distributions on robust cooperation in scale-free networks: a comparative study, Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 1161–1167.

[7] Y. Dong, G. Hao, J. Wang, C. Liu, C. Xia, Cooperation in the spatial public goods game with the second-order reputation evaluation, Phys. Lett. A 383 (2019) 1157–1166.

[8] M. Perc, Phase transitions in models of human cooperation, Phys. Lett. A 380 (2016) 2803–2808.

[9] W. Yang, J. Wang, C. Xia, Evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game with the third-order reputation evaluation, Phys. Lett. A 383 (2019) 125826.

[10] S. Gao, T. Wu, L. Wang, Evolution of global cooperation and ethnocentrism in group-structured populations, Phys. Lett. A 382 (2018) 2027–2043.

[11] Y. Gong, S. Liu, Y. Bai, Reputation-based co-evolutionary model promotes cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126233.

[12] X. Wang, W. Chen, J. Zhao, the evolution of cooperation within the multigame environment based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126165.

[13] M.A. Nowak, Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life, Harvard University Press, 2006.

[14] M. Doebeli, C. Hauert, Models of cooperation based on the prisoner’s dilemma and the snowdrift game, Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005) 748–766.

[15] G. Szabó, G. Fáth, Evolutionary games on graphs, Phys. Rep. 446 (2007) 97–216.

[16] Z. Wang, S. Kokubo, M. Jusup, J. Tanimoto, Universal scaling for the dilemma strength in evolutionary games, Phys. Life Rev. 14 (2015) 1–30.

[17] J. Tanimoto, H. Sagara, Relationship between dilemma occurrence and the existence of a weakly dominant strategy in a two-player symmetric game, Biosystems 90 (2007) 105–114.

[18] J. Tanimoto, M. Brede, A. Yamauchi, Network reciprocity by coexisting learning and teaching strategies, Phys. Rev. E 85 (2012) 032101.

[19] F. Fu, C.E. Tarnita, N. Christakis, L. Wang, D.G. Rand, M.A. Nowak, Evolution of in-group favoritism, Sci. Rep. 2 (2012) 460.

[20] A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game, EPL 92 (2010) 38003.

[21] J.H.W. Tan, F. Bolle, Team competition and the public goods game, Econ. Lett. 96 (2007) 133–139.

[22] F. Fu, T. Wu, L. Wang, Partner switching stabilizes cooperation in coevolutionary prisoner’s dilemma, Phys. Rev. E 79 (2009) 036101.

[23] L. Liu, X. Chen, M. Perc, Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in the public goods game with pool exclusion strategies, Nonlinear Dyn. 97 (2019) 749–766.

[24] A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, Coevolution of teaching activity promotes cooperation, New J. Phys. 10 (2008) 043036.

[25] M. Perc, A. Szolnoki, G. Szabó, Restricted connections among distinguished players support cooperation, Phys. Rev. E 78 (2008) 066101.

[26] J. Tanimoto, Dilemma solving by the coevolution of networks and strategy in a 2 × 2 game, Phys. Rev. E 76 (2007) 021126.

[27] Y. Zhang, F. Fu, T. Wu, G. Xie, L. Wang, Inertia in strategy switching transforms the strategy evolution, Phys. Rev. E 84 (2011) 066103.

[28] X. Chen, A. Szolnoki, Individual wealth-based selection supports cooperation in spatial public goods games, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 32802.

[29] K. Li, R. Cong, T. Wu, L. Wang, Social exclusion in finite populations, Phys. Rev. E 91 (2015) 042810.

[30] A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, resolving social dilemmas on evolving random networks, EPL 86 (2009) 30007.

[31] M. Perc, Phase transitions in models of human cooperation, Phys. Lett. A 380 (2016) 2803–2808.

[32] J. Tanimoto, Promotion of cooperation through co-evolution of networks and strategy in a 2 × 2 game, Physica A 388 (2009) 953–960.

[33] J. Tanimoto, Environmental dilemma game to establish a sustainable society dealing with an emergent value system, Physica D 200 (2005) 1–24.

[34] K. Lindgren, M.G. Nordahl, Evolutionary dynamics of spatial games, Physica D 75 (1994) 292–309.

[35] D. Terman, D. Wang, Global competition and local cooperation in a network of neural oscillators, Physica D 81 (1995) 148–176.

[36] J. Tanimoto, Evolutionary Games with Sociophysics: Analysis of Traffic Flow and Epidemics, Springer, 2018.

[37] J. Tanimoto, Difference of reciprocity effect in two coevolutionary models of presumed two-player and multi-player games, Phys. Rev. E 87 (2013) 062136.

[38] M. Milinski, B. Rockenbach, On the interaction of the stick and the carrot in social dilemmas, J. Theor. Biol. 299 (2012) 139–143.

[39] M. Sutter, S. Haigner, M.G. Kocher, Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations, Rev. Econ. Stud. 77 (2010) 1540–1566.

[40] M. Sefton, R. Shupp, J.M. Walker, The effect of rewards and sanctions in provision of public goods, Econ. Inq. 45 (2007) 671–690.

[41] Y. Wu, S. Chang, Z. Zhang, Z. Deng, Impact of social reward on the evolution of the cooperation behavior in complex networks, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 41076.

[42] S. Wang, X. Chen, A. Szolnoki, Exploring optimal institutional incentives for public cooperation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 79 (2019) 104914.

[43] L. Liu, S. Wang, X. Chen, M. Perc, Evolutionary dynamics in the public goods games with switching between punishment and exclusion, Chaos 28 (2018) 103105.

[44] F. Fu, M.A. Nowak, C. Hauert, Invasion and expansion of cooperators in lattice populations: prisoner’s dilemma vs. snowdrift games, J. Theor. Biol. 266 (2010) 358–366.

[45] Y. Zhang, T. Wu, X. Chen, G. Xie, L. Wang, Mixed strategy under generalized public goods games, J. Theor. Biol. 334 (2013) 52–60.

[46] D.-F. Zheng, H. Yin, C. Chan, P.M. Hui, Europhys. Lett. EPL 80 (2007) 18002.

[47] M.O. Souza, J.M. Pacheco, F.C. Santos, J. Theoret. Biol. 260 (2009) 581.

[48] M. van Veelen, M.A. Nowak, J. Theoret. Biol. 292 (2012) 116.

[49] Gao, Lei, et al. "Collective punishment is more effective than collective reward for promoting cooperation." Scientific Reports 5.X(2015):17752.

[50] Xu, C., et al. "Costly punishment and cooperation in the evolutionary snowdrift game." Physica, A. Statistical mechanics and its applications 390.9(2011).

[51] Xu, Meng, et al. "Cooperative behavior in N-person evolutionary snowdrift games with punishment." Physica, A. Statistical mechanics and its applications 424-(2015).

[52] Li, Kun, et al. "Pool-rewarding in N-person snowdrift game." Chaos Solitons & Fractals 143(2021):110591.

[53] Wang, Shengxian, L. Liu, and X. Chen. "Tax-based pure punishment and reward in the public goods game." Physics Letters A 386(2021):126965.

[54] A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, Europhys. Lett. EPL 92 (2010) 38003.

[55] C. Hilbe, K. Sigmund, Proc. R. Soc. B 277 (2010) 2427.

[56] P. Schuster, K. Sigmund, Replicator dynamics, J. Theor. Biol. 100 (1983) 533–538.

[57] J. Hofbauer, K. Sigmund, Evolutionary game dynamics, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 40 (2003) 479–519.

[58] Bérard, Jean, P. Del Moral, and A. Doucet. "A Lognormal Central Limit Theorem for Particle Approximations of Normalizing Constants." Electronic Journal of Probability 19(2014):1---28.

Downloads

Published

10-10-2024

How to Cite

Liu, Y., & Liu, X. (2024). Taxation Can Significantly Enhance The Effectiveness of Reward and Punishment Mechanisms in The N-Person Snowdrift Game. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 10, 389-405. https://doi.org/10.62051/nqkdp498