Evaluation of the Ecosystem Services Value of Agricultural Industrial Parks under the Background of Tianfu Granary Construction - A Case Study of the Daoming and Longxing Districts in Chongzhou City

Jiatong Wang; Haoran Xv; Yihong Wang; Huan Xie; Ruifeng Zhao

doi:10.62051/n7bw1b04

Authors

Jiatong Wang
Haoran Xv
Yihong Wang
Huan Xie
Ruifeng Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/n7bw1b04

Keywords:

Agricultural Industrial Park; Ecosystem Service Functions; Value Assessment; Construction of Tianfu Granary.

Abstract

In the new era, China faces two major challenges of food security and ecological protection. The agricultural industrial parks constructed in the process of developing the Tianfu Granary play a significant role in China's food supply and ecological security as a special type of farmland ecosystem. Accurately calculating the value of ecosystem services in agricultural industrial parks is of great importance for achieving sustainable agricultural development and comprehensively realizing rural revitalization. This paper takes the Daoming and Longxing Agricultural Industrial Parks in Chongzhou City as the research subjects, constructs an evaluation index system for ecosystem service value, and assesses and calculates the supply, support, regulation, and cultural services of the agricultural industrial parks. The research findings show that the total value of ecosystem services reaches 260.64 million yuan, which is 4.65 times the value of the agricultural products supplied, and its significant ecosystem service value cannot be ignored. Among the ecosystem service values of the park, the cultural service value is the highest, followed by the social security service value. Based on the above conclusions, this paper discusses how to achieve high-standard construction of agricultural industrial parks, providing a scientific basis for the government and policymakers to make correct decisions in the rational use of resources, reduce and avoid short-term economic behaviors that damage ecosystem service functions, and promote sustainable agricultural development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making[J]. Ecological economics, 2009, 68(3): 643-653.

[2] Costanza R, d’ Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997,387: 253-260.

[3] Song Luping. The Path and Experience of Modern Agricultural Parks Leading Rural Economic Development [J]. Agricultural Economics, 2024 (04): 13-16.

[4] Chen Yuanquan, Gao Fengsheng. Overall evaluation of ecological service value of farmland in major grain producing areas in China [J]. China Agricultural Resources and Zoning, 2009, 30 (01): 33-39.

[5] Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miao Hong Preliminary study on the service functions and ecological economic value of terrestrial ecosystems in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 1999,19 (5): 607-613.

[6] Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Leng Yunfa, et al. Valuation of Ecological Assets in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18 (2): 189-196.

[7] Ouyang Z Y, Song C S, Zheng H, et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 2020, 117(25): 14593-14601.

[8] Bai Y, Wong C P, Jiang B, et al. Developing China’s ecological redline policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning [J]. Nature Communications, 2018(9): 1-13.

[9] Liu Xuxiang. Building high-quality and efficient modern agricultural industrial parks [J]. Jiangsu Rural Economy, 2023 (06): 68.

[10] Cui Yongwei. Research on the Competitiveness of National Modern Agricultural Industrial Parks [J]. Agricultural Economics, 2021 (02): 16-18.

[11] Zhang Min. Research on Theory and Practice of Agricultural Industrial Park Planning [D]. Northwest A&F University, 2011.

[12] Zhao Haiyan, Zhu Mengyao, Ma Zheng et al. Study on the Agglomeration Effect of Modern Agricultural Industrial Parks: An Empirical Analysis Based on 8 Residential Areas in Beijing [J/OL]. China Agricultural Resources and Zoning: 1-16 [2400-03-20].

[13] Qiao Han, Liu Aolong, Qiu Kexin. Agricultural Industry Agglomeration and County Economic Growth: Evidence from the Quasi Natural Experiment of Establishing Modern Agricultural Industrial Parks in Henan Province. Business Economics and Management, 2023 (11): 87-100.

[14] Hu Xiaoyan, Yu Fawen, Xu Xiangbo et al. Valuation of Agricultural Ecosystem Services: Construction and Application of Indicator System [J]. Ecological Economics, 2023, 39 (04): 111-121.

[15] Cao Xingjin Multi functional Value Assessment of Farmland Ecosystem [D]. Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013.

[16] Liu Bintao, Song Chunfeng, Tao Heping. Quantitative Evaluation of Soil Erosion in Chengdu City [J]. Journal of Changjiang Academy of Sciences, 2016, 33 (09): 40-47.

[17] Sun Juan, Zhong Wenting, Xie Lihong, et al. Spatial variation characteristics of soil nutrients in cultivated land in Chongzhou City [J]. Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020 (02): 46-48.

[18] Zhang Feixue Assessment of Ecosystem Service Value for Ecological Enhancement of Farmland in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area [D]. Northeast Agricultural University, 2022.

[19] Xie Guanghui, Han Dongqian, Wang Xiaoyu et al. Harvest Index and Straw Coefficient of Grain/Non Grain Field Crops in China [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2011, 16 (01): 1-8.

[20] Zhang Fuchun, Zhu Zhihui. Harvest Index of Chinese Crops [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1990 (02): 83-87.

[21] Yuan Yuan, Liu Jintong, Jin Zhanzhong. Comprehensive evaluation of positive and negative effects of agricultural ecosystem services in Luancheng County [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30 (12): 2809-2814.

[22] Su Benying, Zhang Lu, Chen Shengbin et al. Study on the Spatiotemporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Regional Farmland Ecosystem Productivity: A Case Study of Shandong Province [J]. Journal of Ecological Environment, 2010,19 (09): 2036-2041.