Parties, State Capacity and Economic Development: the Changing Government-Market Relationship

Authors

  • Ruizhi Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/g86s2s34

Keywords:

Party; government - market relations; institutional formation.

Abstract

Political parties, as political organisations, always represent and aim to achieve the interests of a particular class, base or group. The party system, as a legitimate way for political parties to assume, participate in and influence State power, exhibits rich diversity depending on the specific conditions of each country. Meanwhile, as an essential part of the national system, the ruling political Party and its party system play a central role in the country's economic development. In the current context, a single political party system and its economic policies can no longer adapt to the trends of political and economic globalisation and multipolarity, and the comparison of governing experiences and laws among political parties and the exploration of governing laws have become a top priority in the pursuit of national development. In this context, based on the fact that China and the United States which together have global influence, this paper first critically reviews the theoretical explanations of studies on China's economic development and some studies based on China's practical characteristics, and proposes the importance of political parties and state capacity. The paper then summarises and proposes that the institutional characteristics of political party organisations and their governing capacity are the institutional basis of state capacity to promote economic development and market formation and development, and explains the above ideas from the perspective of market formation and development, discussing future challenges and suggestions for improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Huntington, SamuelP. Moore. ClementH. Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dyna-mics of Established One-Party Systems, NewYork: BasicBooks, 1970.

[2] Zhang Changdong. Research on Modernisation of State Governance Capacity - Based on the Perspective of State Capacity Theory. Law Review, 2014, 32(3): 25-33.

[3] Yan Jirong. Institutions, Policies and Effectiveness as the Source of National Governance—in the Context of China's System Advantages and Efficiency Transformation. Case Journal of Political Science, 2020, (02): 2-13.

[4] North D C. Weingast B R. Constitutions and Commitment: the Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 1989, 49(4): 803-832.

[5] Weingast B R. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-preserving Federalism and Economic Development. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1995, 11(1), 1-31.

[6] Royed T J. Borrelli S A. Parties and Economic Policy in the USA: Pledges and Performance, 1976-1992. Party Politics, 1999, 5(1): 115-127.

[7] Shirk S L. The political logic of economic reform in China. Univ of California Press, 1993, 24.

[8] Nathan, A. J. China’s changing of the guard: Authoritarian resilience[M]. Critical Readings on the Communist Party of China . Brill, 2017, 86-99.

[9] Duménil G. Lévy D. The crisis of neoliberalism and U.S. hegemony. Kurswechsel, 2009, 2: 6-13.

[10] Canen N J. Kendall C. Trebbi F. Political parties as drivers of us polarisation: 1927-2018. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2021.

[11] Supyan V D. Trump’s economic model: Results and prospects. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2020, 64(7): 34-42.

[12] Scherrer C. Biden’s foreign economic policy: Crossbreed of Obama and Trump? International Review of Public Policy, 2022, 4(4: 1): 129-138.

[13] Yang T. Zhou F. Du M. Du Q. Zhou S. Fluctuation in the global oil market, stock market volatility, and economic policy uncertainty: a study of the U.S. and China. The quarterly review of economics and finance, 2023, 87: 377-387.

Downloads

Published

05-11-2024

How to Cite

Zhang, R. (2024). Parties, State Capacity and Economic Development: the Changing Government-Market Relationship. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 11, 130-133. https://doi.org/10.62051/g86s2s34