Populism’s Challenges on Party Politics and Electoral Systems—A Comparative Study of USA and European Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/h47zej03Keywords:
Populism; party politics; electoral systems; comparative politics; democracy.Abstract
The backdrop of this research is the global resurgence of populism, which poses various challenges to the conventional practices of party politics, electoral systems and democratic principles, particularly in Western countries. The research’s theme is to examine the impact and challenges of populist movements on political parties and electoral politics through two case studies of the United States and European countries respectively. It first analyzes how populism rises under a state’s party politics and electoral system, then discusses how it affects and poses challenges to party politics and democratic political orders. Through the methodology of comparative analysis, the research found that plurality voting presidentialism represented by the USA encourages charismatic populism with an authoritarian tendency despite the structure of two-party politics and European countries’ mixed-member parliamentary system allows populist parties to rise through split-voting but not to easily dominate as the ruling party. The conclusion is that populism’ rise under universal suffrage democracy is inevitable regardless of party and electoral systems but the negative impacts can be restrained by suitable institutional designs and self-correcting mechanisms of political parties, thus including populism in democratic systems instead of viewing populism as naturally contradictory to constitutional democracy.
Downloads
References
[1] Gandesha Samir. “Understanding right and left populism.” Critical theory and authoritarian populism, edited by jeremiah morelock, University of Westminster Press, 2018, (9): 49–70.
[2] Riedel Rafal. Populism and its democratic, non-democratic, and anti-democratic potential. Polish Sociological Review, 2017, 199: 287-298.
[3] Glaser Elaine. Anti-Politics: On the demonization of ideology, authority and the State. Repeater Books, London, 2018, 20.
[4] Rosanvallon Pierre. Democracy past and future. Columbia University Press, New York, 2006.
[5] Weber Maximillan. The theory of social and economic organization. Free Press Reprint, New York, 1997.
[6] Mill John. On Liberty. Batoche Books, Kitchener, 2001, 9-10
[7] Oliver J. Wendy M. Rahn. “Rise of the ‘Trumpenvolk’: Populism in the 2016 Election.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2016, 667: 189–206.
[8] Dick Hannah. “Not Without Precedent: Populist White Evangelical Support for Trump.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 2017, 61: 26–31.
[9] Leip Dave. ‘1992 Presidential Election Results’ from Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. 2005, Retrieved from https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=1992
[10] Noel Hans. “Ideological Factions in the Republican and Democratic Parties.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2016, 667: 166–188.
[11] Murray, Patrick. National: trump gains on desantis, maga loyalists stand by former president. 2015, Retrieved from https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/documents/monmouthpoll_us_032123_2.pdf/
[12] Decker Frank. The “Alternative for Germany:” Factors Behind its Emergence and Profile of a New Right-wing Populist Party. German Politics and Society, 2016, 34(2): 1-16.
[13] Grimm, Robert. “The rise of the German eurosecptic party Alternative Für Deutschland, between ordoliberal critique and popular anxiety.” International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 2015, 36(3): 264–278.
[14] Klikauer, Thomas. “German Neo-Nazis and a new party.” Jewish Political Studies Review, 2019, 30(1/2): 243–252.
[15] Gurr, Ted. “Psychological factors in civil violence.” World Politics, 1968, 20(2): 245-278.
[16] Tilly, Charles. Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, 13-14.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








