Application of Negotiation Techniques to Actual Cases—An Analysis of International Negotiations on US Foreign Affairs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/wwcaqz78Keywords:
Negotiation; Interest-Based Bargaining; International Relations; International Trade; Communication.Abstract
In today’s fast-paced world, the positioning of countries in the global economy underscores the growing influence of international communication and cooperative relations. Central to this development is the essential instrument of negotiation. This paper reviews the case of the negotiations between the United Nations and the United States, which have significantly impacted the global community and international relations. The author explains the importance and utility of negotiation techniques in promoting cooperation, stability, and agreement and examines how these techniques can be efficiently applied in various real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper investigates the limitations of negotiation techniques when used in isolation and how they interact with other factors. It analyzes how negotiators can enhance their overall competence to achieve better communication results. The article highlights the subtle and ongoing effects of successful negotiations on both the negotiators and the parties they represent. This case study aims to contribute to the enhancement of effective communication between nations and individuals and to popularize the use of bargaining skills and mindsets. By doing so, it seeks to enable the general public to maximize mutual benefits more efficiently during negotiations. This research not only provides insights into the practical application of negotiation strategies but also underscores their broader implications for international diplomacy and cooperation.
Downloads
References
[1] M. Frances. Processes of international negotiations. Routledge, 2019.
[2] Malhotra, Deepak, and M. H. Bazerman. Investigative negotiation. Harvard business review 85.9 (2007): 72.
[3] P. R. Harris and R. T. Moran, Managing cultural differences: High performance strategies for a new world of business, Houston, TX: Gulf (1991).
[4] W. L. Adair, T. Okumura, and J. M. Brett, Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), (2001) 371–385.
[5] Malhotra, Deepak, and M. H. Bazerman. Negotiation Genius: How to Overcome Obstacles and Achieve Brilliant Results at the Bargaining Table and Beyond. Bantam Books, 2008.
[6] A. F. Chadwick. The United States in the United Nations. International Organization 27.1 (1973): 1–23.
[7] A. O. Hero. The United States Public and the United Nations. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 1977, 32(4): 17–29.
[8] E. Olson. US Negotiates a Reduction of Its Dues to Support WHO. The New York Times, The New York Times, May 22, 2001, www.nytimes.com/2001/05/22/world/us-negotiates-a-reduction-of-its-dues-to-support-who.html.
[9] Done Deal. C.B.S. News, C.B.S. Interactive, www.cbsnews.com/news/done-deal-22-12-2000/.
[10] M. Karen. Troubled waters: The United States-United Nations relationship. International Peacekeeping, 2003, 10 (4): 82–93.
[11] Browne, M. Ann, and L. Blanchfield. United Nations Regular Budget Contributions: Members Compared, 1990-2010. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 2013.
[12] R. Fisher. Fractionating conflict. In R. Fisher (Ed.), International conflict and behavioral science: The Craigville papers. New York: Basic Books, 1964.
[13] M. G. Bonham. Simulating international disarmament negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1971, 15, 299-315.
[14] D. Druckman. Position change in cognitive conflict as a function of the cue-criterion relationship and the initial conflict. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 20, 91-93.
[15] D. A. Summers. Conflict, compromise, and belief change in a decision-making task. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1968, 12, 215-221.
[16] D. Druckman, and R. Mahoney. Processes and consequences of international negotiations. Journal of Social Issues, 1997, 33(1): 60–87.
[17] L. Colum. Turner Offers $35 Million to Help US Pay UN Dues - The Washington Post, December 21, 2000, www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/12/22/turner-offers-35-million-to-help-us-pay-un-dues/b0357400-8341-4b9e-b0be-2daf8ecc2795/.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








