Policy Text AI Mining Study —— A Comparative Analysis Based on U.S., U.K., and Chinese Policies

Authors

  • Zixian Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/j9nwwg17

Keywords:

LDA Thematic Modeling, Policy tools, AI policy.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a key strategic area to enhance national competitiveness globally. We adopts a textual analysis methodology, based on the three-dimensional framework of policy tools and the LDA thematic model, to conduct a systematic analysis and comparative study of the AI policy texts of the United States, the United Kingdom, and China. The study aims to reveal the policy stance, strategic planning, and challenges and opportunities faced by the three countries in the field of AI. Through the analysis, the study identifies the major themes in the policy texts of each country and maps them to the three dimensions of supply, demand, and environment of policy tools. The study finds that the US AI policy focuses on international cooperation, fair civil rights, and innovation ecology; the UK emphasizes ethical governance and legal regulation; and China highlights innovation-driven and smart economy development. In addition, all three countries emphasize building a stable, predictable and innovation-supportive policy environment. The study puts forward a series of comprehensive recommendations, including strengthening international cooperation, balancing innovation and regulation, optimizing a supportive innovation ecosystem, improving the legal system, focusing on talent cultivation, and building an AI innovation alliance. These recommendations aim to promote the healthy development of global AI technologies and maximize their positive contributions to the economy and society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ma Chizhu, Wang Yongchao, Liu Li, et al. Analysis of national policies on artificial intelligence under the framework of "goals-issues-tools" and suggestions for its development based on the mirror scanning of policy texts in the past ten years[J]. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2023(3):221-234.

[2] ZHAO Juan, CHANG Duofan, MENG Tianguang. The development progress of AI governance at home and abroad:A portfolio analysis based on the TOPE governance framework[J]. Peking University Political Science Review, 2023(2):96-117.

[3] Wang Wenshu. Analysis of evolutionary patterns of artificial intelligence-related research and applications: a bibliometric and thematic modeling perspective [D]. South China University of Technology, 2019.DOI: 10.27151/d.cnki.ghnlu.2019.001448.

[4] Sultani, Pease, Bongguohe. A study on semantics, thematic features and evolution of AI policies in China - a quantitative analysis based on policy texts[J]. Journal of Literature and Data,2023,5(04):16-29.

[5] Bi Xiaorong. China's Artificial Intelligence Policy Text Analysis and Policy Innovation - An Analysis Based on Post-ELSI Framework[J]. Industrial Innovation Research,2024, (04):35-37.

[6] Guenduez A A, Mettler T. Strategically constructed narratives on artificial intelligence: What stories are told in governmental artificial intelligence policies? [J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2023, 40(1): 101719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101719

[7] Chen Mei,Sun Ruichan. Quantitative analysis of China's provincial digital economy policy texts in the view of policy tools - Thematic social network analysis based on LDA[J]. Journal of Intelligence,2023,42(11):174-182.

[8] Y. Zhang, Y. Yang, W. Deng. China's cyberspace governance from policy and sectoral perspectives-A big data analysis based on LDA and SNA[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition),2019,21(02): 127-136.DOI:10.15918/j. jbitss1009-3370.2019.2801.

[9] CAO Rong,LIU Yanzhi,WANG Zheng. A study on the evolution of cooperative networks and thematic hotspots of China's philanthropic policy - a big data analysis based on SNA and LDA[J]. Social Security Research,2023, (01):41-52.

[10] ZHAO Qi, CHEN Drunk. Structural characteristics of China's emergency management policy network and its evolution: a social network analysis based on the policy literature at the central level[J]. China Emergency Management Science,2023, (06):25-43.

[11] Rothwell R O Y, Zegveld W. An assessment of government innovation policies[J]. Review of Policy Research, 1984, 3(3‐4): 436-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00138.x

[12] Lu Zhangping, Wang Xiaojing. Research on scientific and technological achievements transformation policy based on content analysis method[J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2013, 30(11): 98-102.

[13] Steyvers M, Griffiths T. Probabilistic topic models[M]//Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Psychology Press, 2007: 439-460.

[14] Sievert C, Shirley K, Davis L. A method for visualizing and interpreting topics[C]//Proceedings of Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, Association for Computational Linguistics. 2023: 63-70.

Downloads

Published

10-10-2024

How to Cite

Wang, Z. (2024). Policy Text AI Mining Study —— A Comparative Analysis Based on U.S., U.K., and Chinese Policies. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 10, 96-112. https://doi.org/10.62051/j9nwwg17