Study on livelihood sustainability and rural revitalisation policy effects of poverty-eradicating households based on DID model analysis

Jiamei Zhang; Weijie Lei; Jia Yu; Le Li

doi:10.62051/m0h0rq24

Authors

Jiamei Zhang
Weijie Lei
Jia Yu
Le Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/m0h0rq24

Keywords:

Consolidating and expanding the results of poverty eradication; livelihood sustainability; DID modelling; policy effects; Gannan Soviet area

Abstract

China has achieved a comprehensive victory in the battle against poverty. At present, China is accelerating the effective connection between consolidating the results of poverty eradication and rural revitalisation. Based on the SLA framework, this paper constructs a livelihood sustainability indicator system and evaluates it through the entropy weight method, takes Gannan Soviet District as the study area, and based on the two-period DID model, empirically examines the impact of the policy of consolidating and expanding the results of poverty alleviation and rural revitalisation on the sustainability of the livelihoods of the households that have been lifted out of poverty, using the two-period panel data in 2020 and 2022 of the 243 farming households. The findings show that the policy of consolidating and expanding the effective linkage between poverty eradication and rural revitalisation has a significant driving effect on the livelihood sustainability of farm households, increasing the level of livelihood sustainability of farm households by 11.3%, and the conclusion remains reliable after the robustness test. Heterogeneity analyses found that the policy contributed more to the livelihood sustainability level of poverty-eradicating households whose head had a high level of education. The policy has a more significant positive effect on the livelihood sustainability of labour-led and agriculture-led households out of poverty than part-time employment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Pan, H., Yao, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2024). Research on Financial Poverty Alleviation Aid for Increasing the Incomes of Low-Income Chinese Farmers. Sustainability, 16(3), 1057.

[2] Tian, F. Analysis of the Practical Path of Vocational Education Serving Rural Revitalization by Digital Means and Philosophy of Technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences.

[3] Wen, Y., & Liu, K. (2023). Literature Review on the Spirit of Poverty Alleviation. Social Security and Administration Management, 4(8), 80-91.

[4] Dahiya, B., De Pascale, F., De Pietro, O., Farabollini, P., Lugeri, F. R., & Mercatanti, L. (2023). Disaster Resilience and Human Settlements in the Anthropocene. In Disaster Resilience and Human Settlements: Emerging Perspectives in the Anthropocene (pp. 3-18). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

[5] Nkongho, A. M., & George, C. N. Threats of Global Climate Change: A Review of the Driver to Multiples Environmental Degradation, Human Right Injustice and Unsustainable Development.

[6] Jayasinghe, M. (2022). Conclusion and Policy Implications. In Poverty, Food Consumption, and Economic Development (pp. 95-103). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

[7] Najam, Z. (2021). The sensitivity of poverty trends to dimensionality and distribution sensitivity in poverty measures—District level analysis for Pakistan. Poverty & Public Policy, 13(4), 368-411.

[8] Vibhuti, S. G., & Barki, G. S. (2023). An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility As A Driver For India's Sustainable Growth Using An Esg Model. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 10(5), 205-212.

[9] Rambe, R. A., Purmini, P., & Anitasari, M. (2023). Probability of Getting Households Out of Poverty: Empirical Studies in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 31(2), 397-416.

[10] Nylund, P. A., Agarwal, N., Probst, C., & Brem, A. (2022). Firm engagement in UN Sustainable Development Goals: Introduction of a constraints map from a corporate reports content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133446.