Evaluating the Economic Impact of Special Economic Zones on GDP per Capita in China: A Difference-in-Differences Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/1yp6kr18Keywords:
Special Economic Zones (SEZs), GDP per capita (GDPc), Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Economic Impact, Regional Development, China, Policy Implementation, Fixed Effects, Robustness Check, Comparative StudiesAbstract
This study investigates the economic impact of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) on GDP per capita (GDPc) in China using a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach. By comparing cities designated as SEZs with those that were not, the analysis assesses the effect of SEZ policies implemented at different times. The results indicate that SEZs have a robust, positive, and significant impact on GDPc, with earlier treated cities experiencing a higher positive effect than later treated ones. This underscores the importance of timely policy implementation in maximizing economic benefits. Robustness checks, including two-way fixed effects and state-specific linear time trends, reinforce the reliability of the findings. However, the study acknowledges several limitations, such as the potential weakening of the parallel trends assumption over time, the use of a binary treatment variable, and the specific context of China's SEZ policy which may limit generalizability. Future research should address these limitations by exploring continuous treatment variables, incorporating additional control variables, and conducting comparative studies in different contexts. Despite these limitations, the findings provide valuable insights into the economic effects of SEZs and contribute to the broader understanding of regional economic development policies.
Downloads
References
[1] Chen, H., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Xu, Z., Wu, C., & Li, Y. (2023, September 23). Identifying environmental information disclosure manipulation behavior through machine learning: A comparative analysis of recognition models. In 2023 IEEE 6th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education (ICISCAE) (pp. 1052-1059).
[2] Faber, B. (2014). Trade integration, market size, and industrialization: Evidence from China's National Trunk Highway System. Journal of Development Economics, 107, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.009
[3] Goodman-Bacon, A. (2019). So you’ve been told to do my difference-in-differences thing: A guide [Ebook]. Retrieved May 21, 2024, from https://cdn.vanderbilt.edu/vu-my/wp-content/uploads/sites/2318/2019/10/09023516/so_youve_been_told_dd_10_9_2019.pdf
[4] National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook. Retrieved from https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj.htm
[5] Qian, Y., Li, Y., Hao, Y., Yu, T., & Hu, H. (2023). Greenhouse gas control in steel manufacturing: Inventory, assurance, and strategic reduction review. Carbon Research, 3(1), 27.
[6] Song, Y., Deng, R., Liu, R., & Peng, Q. (2020). Effects of Special Economic Zones on FDI in emerging economies: Does institutional quality matter? Sustainability, 12(20), 8409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208409
[7] Song, Z., He, Q., & Shen, L. (2020). The impact of Special Economic Zones on regional economic development: Evidence from China. China Economic Quarterly International, 1(1), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2021.11.004
[8] Wang, Y., Hao, Y., Hou, Y., Quan, Q., & Li, Y. (2023). Optimizing scope 3 emissions in the automotive manufacturing industry: A multidisciplinary approach. Carbon Research, 3(1), 49.
[9] Wu, M., Liu, C., & Huang, J. (2021). The special economic zones and innovation: Evidence from China. China Economic Quarterly International, 1(4), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2021.11.004
[10] Xiao, P., & Li, Y. (2023). Dose response assessment of silica exposure and poisoning of construction workers. Environmental Pollutants and Bioavailability, 35(1), 2190489.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








