Integrity Culture and Socio-economic Development Interactions and Synergies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/8dbpnj13Keywords:
Integrity Culture; Socio-economic Development; Synergy; Anti-corruption; Government Governance.Abstract
As a core element of social ethics and institutions, the culture of integrity has a profound impact on social and economic development. It directly promotes steady economic growth and social harmony and stability by improving the efficiency of government governance, optimising resource allocation and enhancing social trust. The existence and promotion of a culture of integrity can reduce corruption, ensure the rational use of public resources, create a market environment of fair competition, thus attracting more investment, stimulating market vitality, promoting technological innovation and industrial upgrading, and achieving sustained and healthy economic development. The favourable trend of socio-economic development in turn provides a solid foundation for the consolidation of a culture of integrity. Economic prosperity has increased the resources of the government and social organisations, allowing for more support and investment in anti-corruption work, improving the rule of law and supervision mechanisms, and raising the public's education level and legal awareness. With the improvement of material living standards and the overall quality of society brought about by economic development, citizens' sense of integrity and social responsibility have also increased, forming a good atmosphere in which the culture of integrity is more deeply rooted in people's hearts. However, the relationship between the culture of integrity and social and economic development is not always smooth and unhindered. Rapid economic growth may be accompanied by the prevalence of profit-driven and materialism, inducing some people to pursue illegal interests and leading to the breeding and spread of corrupt behaviour. Therefore, while promoting economic development, it is necessary to attach great importance to the construction of a culture of integrity, strengthen integrity education and institutional construction, and ensure that the culture of integrity is promoted in tandem with economic development. In short, there is a significant synergistic effect between the culture of integrity and social and economic development, and the two complement each other to promote the overall progress of society. Integrity culture promotes the healthy development of the economy by optimising the governance and market environment; while economic development provides the necessary material basis and social conditions for the dissemination and consolidation of integrity culture. To realise the benign interaction between the culture of integrity and socio-economic development, it is necessary to adhere to the rule of law to combat corruption, strengthen institutional construction, deepen the education of integrity, and create a social atmosphere of respect for integrity. Through the joint efforts of society as a whole, the synergistic effect of a culture of integrity and socio-economic development can be brought into full play, and society can be promoted to achieve the goals of fair, just and sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Hiwaki, K. (2021). From Growing to Maturing: Integral Harmony and Global Integrity. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 70-104.
Opuni-Darko, G. (2024). Examining the Synergy Between the Marketplace and the Church in Ghana: Strategies for Enhancing Socio-Economic Development.
Panzera, E. (2022). The Socio-Economic Impact of Cultural Heritage: Setting the Scene. Cultural Heritage and Territorial Identity: Synergies and Development Impact on European Regions, 1-41.
Eisenmenger, N., Pichler, M., Krenmayr, N., Noll, D., Plank, B., Schalmann, E., ... & Gingrich, S. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1101-1110.
Han, D., Yu, D., & Qiu, J. (2023). Assessing coupling interactions in a safe and just operating space for regional sustainability. Nature Communications, 14(1), 1369.
Chen, L., Yang, H., Huang, H., Chang, M., Wang, X., Han, D., ... & Yang, Q. (2023). How do natural and socio-economic factors influence the sustainable development of the ecological environment in the World Natural Heritage Sites? Evidence from the Jiuzhaigou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139238.
Bozhenko, V. V. (2021). Enhancing Business Integrity as a Mechanism for Combating Corruption and Shadow Schemes in the Country.
Zhao, W., Yin, C., Hua, T., Meadows, M. E., Li, Y., Liu, Y., ... & Fu, B. (2022). Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in the post-pandemic era. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-7.
Hao, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023). Evaluation of socio-economic-ecological environmental benefits of urban renewal projects based on the coupling coordination degree. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(19), 56946-56968.
Sitnova, I., Barlybaev, A., Barlybaev, U., Ishnazarov, D., & Nasyrov, G. (2023). X-factor of rural development: role and place in ESG model of balanced growth. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 462, p. 01027). EDP Sciences.
MartÃnez, J. D. S. (2023). Olive Grove Landscapes in Andalusia: In Search of Synergies Between Agrarian Cultural Heritage and Rural Development. European Countryside, 15(3), 422-441.
Huang, Y., & Wu, J. (2023). Spatial and temporal driving mechanisms of ecosystem service trade-off/synergy in national key urban agglomerations: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110800.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.