Study on the Impact of Environmental Governance Effectiveness on Public Participation in Pro-Environmental Behaviour

-- An Empirical Analysis from CGSS2021 Data

Authors

  • Ziqiao Jin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/va0qrz68

Keywords:

CGSS2021; Environmental Governance Effectiveness; Public Participation in Pro-Environmental.

Abstract

In recent years, the disharmonious relationship between human beings and the natural environment has become increasingly evident,and ecological and environmental problems have become progressively more serious.Public participation in pro-environmental behaviour is an important measure for the effective protection of the ecological environment and the real realisation of harmonious coexistence between man and nature.However, few current studies on pro-environmental behaviours have analysed pro-environmental behaviours from the perspective of the effects of environmental governance.Therefore,based on the theory of "attitude-behaviour-situation", this study constructed an ordered probability unit model to investigate the impact of environmental governance on public participation in pro-environmental behaviours.The empirical test was conducted by using data from a sample of 7617 households from the 2021 China General Social Survey using stata 17.0 software. The results show that environmental governance effects significantly influence citizens' private domain pro-environmental behaviour, while the effects are insignificant in terms of public domain pro-environmental behaviour. Meanwhile, through the heterogeneity test, it was found that age and socio-economic status positively motivate public participation in private pro-environmental behaviours, while the number of family members negatively motivates public participation in private pro-environmental behaviours.The results of this paper have some implications for environmental governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cai Shanquan. Exploration of methods and innovative practices of ecological environment management in the new era[J]. Leather Making and Environmental Protection Technology, 2023, 4 (20):67-68+81.DOI:10.

ZHANG Jingwei,LI Jiasheng,LU Yanru. The role and development of environmental monitoring in ecological environmental protection[J]. Cleaning World,2024,40(04):154-156.

ZHENG Wenjuan,HUANG Xuri,BAO Zhanxiong,et al. Mechanisms of nature contact on pro-environmental behaviours of urban residents-an analysis of mediating effects based on nature linkage[J/OL]. Journal of Fujian Normal University(Natural Science Edition):1-9[2024-04-28].

Hairong Wang. The effect of reverence on college students' pro-environmental behaviours: a moderated chain mediation model[D]. Soochow University,2023.DOI:10.

Du Wencui,Wan Qinyuan. A study on the impact of social capital on public pro-environmental behaviour - Empirical evidence from CGSS2013[J]. Soft Science,2022,36(11):59-64+80.DOI:10.

Sun Lin,Chen Xiujuan. Research on the influencing factors of pro-environmental behaviour of B&B customers[J]. Guangxi Journal of Agriculture,2022,37(02):44-54.Zhao Ling,Tian Yuan. A study on the factors influencing the water environmental protection behaviours of residents along the Yangtze River - based on the extended normative activation model[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2023,46(03):123-132.

LI Suwan,YANG Jiameng,QIU Mengluo,et al. A study on the influencing factors of pro-environmental behaviour in colleges and universities--Based on the perspective of college students' willingness to classify rubbish[J]. China Environmental Management,2022,14(02):19-26.

LI Suwan, YANG Jiameng. Progress of Research on Pro-Environmental Behaviour[J]. Resource Development and Markets,2024,40(04):492-502.

Guagnano, Gregory A ,Stern,et al.Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling.[J].Environment & Behavior, 1995.

He Xingbang,Mao Jie. The moderating role of behavioural efficacy cognition on pro-environmental behaviour [J/OL]. Journal of Hebei Institute of Environmental Engineering:1-8[2024-05-07].

Zhu Jianrong,Zhou Yanyan,Zhang Yuan,et al. A study on the relationship between environmental values and ecological consumption behaviour - moderated by consumer perceived efficacy [J]. Research on Business Economy, 2019 (03):39-42.

Li Qiucheng. The influence of perceived behavioural efficacy on tourists' environmental behavioural decisions[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition),2015,(4):459-465.

Sheng Guanghua,Wang Litong,Che Siyu. The effect of natural empathy on pro-environmental behaviours under the perspective of harmonious coexistence between humans and nature[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition),2021,41(01):51-60.

LIU Jiankun,ZHANG Yunliang. Internet use, environmental knowledge and public pro-environmental behaviour[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition),2022,24(02):73-81.

WANG Xiaonan,LIU Lin. Multi-layer analysis of Chinese residents' willingness to engage in environmental behaviours - an empirical analysis based on 2013 CSS data[J]. Journal of Jishou University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 38(01): 80-90. DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2017.01.011.

Xie Hongzuo. Research on factors influencing rural population's willingness to participate in climate change action - A survey based on Suzhou, Lu and Anhui[J]. China Population Science,2011,(06):102-108+112.

WANG Yujun, HAN Donglin. Economic Development, Environmental Pollution and Public Environmental Behaviour-A Multi-Level Analysis Based on China's CGSS2013 Data[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2016, 30(02):79-92.

Wang Xiaonan. Multi-layer analysis of public participation behaviour in environmental governance[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition),2018,20(05):37-45.

XU Zhigang,ZHANG Jiong,QIU Huanguang. A study on the impact of reputational claims on farmers' pro-environmental behaviours--an example of poultry farmers' pollutant treatment choices[J]. China Population-Resources and Environment,2016,26(10):44-52.

GUO Qinghui,LI Shiping,NAN Ling. Farmers' pro-environmental behaviour under the perspective of environmental literacy[J]. Resource Science,2020,42(05):856-869.

LIU Zheng,ZHOU Jing. Information capacity, environmental risk perception and farmers' pro-environmental behaviour adoption - an empirical test based on broiler farmers in Liaoning Province[J]. Agricultural Technology and Economy,2018(10):135-144.DOI:10.

Guo Lijing,Zhao Jin. Informal system and pro-environmental behaviours of farm households - an example of farmers' straw disposal behaviours[J]. China Population-Resources and Environment,2014,24(11):69-75.

ZHU Qinghai,LEI Yun. A study on the impact of social capital on the pro-environmental behaviour of farmers' straw disposal - based on survey data from farmers in L County, Hubei Province[J]. Arid Zone Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(11): 15-21. DOI:10.

Gao P, Bai Fuchen, Zheng Wolin. Environmental regulation, digital information channels and farmers' pro-environmental behaviour[J]. Ecological Economy,2024,40(04):129-135.

Li Wenming,Yin Chengqiang,Tang Wenyue,et al. Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviours of bird-watching tourists-with nature empathy and perceived environmental education as mediating variables[J]. Economic Geography,2019,39(01):215-224.DOI:10.

Liu Xianwei,Wu Jianping. Environmental values and pro-environmental behaviours of college students:The mediating role of environmental concern[J]. Psychological and Behavioural Research,2013,11(06):780-785.

SHI Zhiheng, JIN Rongrong, MU Hongjie, et al. Research on farmers' pro-environmental behaviours based on the perspective of media education function--an analysis of the mediating effects of environmental knowledge and values [J]. Arid Zone Resources and Environment,2018,32(10):76-81.DOI:10.

Downloads

Published

05-06-2024

How to Cite

Jin, Z. (2024). Study on the Impact of Environmental Governance Effectiveness on Public Participation in Pro-Environmental Behaviour: -- An Empirical Analysis from CGSS2021 Data. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 7, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.62051/va0qrz68