A Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Authors

  • Xiaowen Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/mam9km07

Keywords:

Greenhouse Gas Prediction; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Explainable AI; Emission Modelling.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is critical in guiding informed climatic policymaking but has traditionally suffered from spatial biases, reporting lags, and inconsistent data. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have in recent times become viable options for dealing with the complex, non-linear relationships in emissions data. These data-oriented methodologies have been used widely across sectors, showing high accuracy in prediction and flexibility. Here, this paper reviews recent advances in the application of ML and DL for the prediction of GHG emissions through their theoretical underpinnings, empirical performance using public datasets, and the use of explainable artificial intelligence (AI). A contrastive evaluation of exemplary studies identifies patterns in model performance, interpretability, and dependence on data. Special attention is paid to model interpretability and the contribution of explainable AI in increasing the policy applicability of methodologies. This paper contributes to an open, scalable, and actionable approach to data-driven decision support in climatic management, by linking technical advances to policy utility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zheng Xueyan, Streimikiene Dalia, Balezentis Tomas, Mardani Abbas, Cavallaro Federico, Liao Hua. A Review of Greenhouse Gas Emission Profiles, Dynamics, and Climate Change Mitigation Efforts Across the Key Climate Change Players. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 234: 1113–1133.

[2] Yazd S D, Gharib N, Derakhshandeh J F. Investigations on Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Longitudinal Regression Methods for Global Greenhouse Gases Predictions. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2025, 22(7): 5249–5262.

[3] IPCC. Sixth Assessment Report—IPCC [Online]. Available at: [https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/](https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/) [Accessed in: 15 May, 2025].

[4] Zheng Bo, Geng Geng, Ciais Philippe, Davis Steven J., Martin Randall V., Meng Jing, Zhang Qiang. Satellite-Based Estimates of Decline and Rebound in China’s CO₂ Emissions During COVID-19 Pandemic. Science Advances, 2020, 6(49): eabd4998.

[5] Li Xiaoyan, Zhang Xiaoxing. A Comparative Study of Statistical and Machine Learning Models on Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prediction of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(55): 117485–117502.

[6] Altikat Selim. Prediction of CO₂ Emission from Greenhouse to Atmosphere with Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning Neural Networks. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2021, 18(10): 3169–3178.

[7] Behvandi Omid, Ghorbani Hamed. Predicting Future Climate Scenarios: A Machine Learning Perspective on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agrifood Systems. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2024, 12: 1471599.

[8] Cullen L., Marinoni A., Cullen J. Machine Learning for Gap‐Filling in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Databases. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2024, 28(4): 636–647.

[9] Yu Wen, Xia Lin, Cao Qiang. A Machine Learning Algorithm to Explore the Drivers of Carbon Emissions in Chinese Cities. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 23609.

[10] Fortier Mathieu, Richter M. L., Sonnentag Oliver, Pal C. CarbonSense: A Multimodal Dataset and Baseline for Carbon Flux Modelling. arXiv preprint, 2024: arXiv:2406.04940.

[11] Alam G M I, Arfin Tanim S, Sarker S K, Watanobe Y, Islam R, Mridha M F, Nur K. Deep Learning Model Based Prediction of Vehicle CO₂ Emissions with Explainable AI Integration for Sustainable Environment. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 3655.

[12] Ghorbal A B, Grine A, Elbatal I, Almetwally E M, Eid M M, El-Kenawy E S M. Predicting Carbon Dioxide Emissions Using Deep Learning and Ninja Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 4021.

[13] Hsu Angel, Wang Xin, Tan Jingru, Toh Wei, Goyal Nikhil. Predicting European Cities’ Climate Mitigation Performance Using Machine Learning. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 7487.

[14] Giannelos S, Bellizio F, Strbac G, Zhang Tong. Machine Learning Approaches for Predictions of CO₂ Emissions in the Building Sector. Electric Power Systems Research, 2024, 235: 110735.

[15] Reay D S, Davidson E A, Smith K A, Smith P, Melillo J M, Dentener F, Crutzen P J. Global Agriculture and Nitrous Oxide Emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2(6): 410–416.

[16] Quéré Sylvie, Levasseur A. Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Hands-On Options for Measuring GHG and Pollutants in Smart Cities. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2020, 249(12): 285–293.

[17] Timilsina G, Pang J, Yang X. Linking Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models for Climate Policy Analysis: The Case of China. Unpublished, 2021.

[18] Saunois M, Martinez A, Poulter B, Zhang Z, Raymond P A, Regnier P, Zhuang Q. Global Methane Budget 2000–2020. Earth System Science Data, 2025, 17(5): 1873–1958.

[19] Hamrani A, Akbarzadeh A, Madramootoo C A. Machine Learning for Predicting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Soils. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 741: 140338.

[20] Wu Lijuan, Huang Zhen, Zhang Xinyu, Wang Yiyang. Harmonizing Existing Climate Change Mitigation Policy Datasets with a Hybrid Machine Learning Approach. Scientific Data, 2024, 11(1): 580.

[21] Ajala A A, Adeoye O L, Salami O M, Jimoh A Y. An Examination of Daily CO₂ Emissions Prediction Through a Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Statistical Models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025, 32: 1–26.

[22] Udoh J, Lu Jing, Xu Qiang. Application of Machine Learning to Predict CO₂ Emissions in Light-Duty Vehicles. Sensors, 2024, 24(24): 8219.

Downloads

Published

10-07-2025

How to Cite

Chen, X. (2025) “A Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 9, pp. 684–690. doi:10.62051/mam9km07.