Fluid Simulation Analysis of Eulerian, Lagrangian, and Hybrid Approaches for Graphics and CFD Applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/6bg3ab97Keywords:
Fluid Simulation; Eulerian Mesh-based Techniques; SPH; Hybrid Frameworks.Abstract
Fluid simulation has emerged as a key area bridging computer graphics and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), enabling realistic simulation of liquids, gases, and reacting phenomena in entertainment, engineering, and scientific applications. This review systematically evaluates three major simulation paradigms—Eulerian mesh-based techniques, Lagrangian particle-centric methods, and hybrid approaches—by analyzing their theoretical foundations, implementation challenges, and performance results. The thesis examines the strengths and weaknesses of Eulerian–Stokes solvers for stable large-scale simulations, Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for adaptive fluid tracking, and hybrid frameworks such as Fluid Implicit Particle (FLIP) that incorporate mesh-particle duality. Case studies covering filmmaking, disaster scenario modeling, and real-time gaming demonstrate that hybrid approaches can reduce computational costs by up to 40% while maintaining visual and physical fidelity and outperform pure Eulerian or Lagrangian systems in terms of scalability. Emerging trends, including GPU-accelerated solvers, machine learning-enhanced turbulence modeling, and adaptive mesh refinement (AMR), are considered transformative drivers for future developments. The study highlights how interdisciplinary innovations, such as physically-informed neural networks (PINN) and multiresolution coupling, reshape simulation accuracy and efficiency. By synthesizing these insights, this study provides a roadmap for optimizing the next generation of fluid simulation tools, highlighting the need for adaptive hardware-aware algorithms to meet the growing computational demands in industrial and research environments.
Downloads
References
[1] WANG Xiao Kun, et al. Physics-based fluid simulation in computer graphics: Survey, research trends, and challenges. Computational Visual Media, 2024, 10(5): 803-858.
[2] HU Jin Kai, et al. Deep real-time volumetric rendering using multi-feature fusion. ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Proceedings. 2023, 1-10.
[3] MACKLIN Miles, and MATTHIAS Müller. Position based fluids. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 2013, 32(4): 1-12.
[4] CHEN Yi Xin, et al. GPU optimization for high-quality kinetic fluid simulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2021, 28(9): 3235-3251.
[5] BUTTINGER Kreuzhuber Andreas, et al. An integrated GPU-accelerated modeling framework for high-resolution simulations of rural and urban flash floods. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2022, 156: 105480.
[6] LYU Luan, et al. Affine particle-in-cell method for two-phase liquid simulation. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 2021, 3(2): 105-117.
[7] NGUYEN H, et al. Adaptive SPH-AMR for Multiphase Industrial Flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 435: 110265.
[8] FOSTER Nick, and DIMITRI Metaxas. Realistic animation of liquids. Graphical models and image processing, 1996, 58(5): 471-483.
[9] FANG Lean, and PING He. Field inversion machine learning augmented turbulence modeling for time-accurate unsteady flow. Physics of Fluids, 2024. 36(5), 1.
[10] CHEN Xin, et al. Transformer-Based Turbulence Modeling for SPH Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 459: 111532.
[11] WAJEH Yasin AM, PAUL Hatton, and NICHOLAS Lee. Unreal Engine 5 and immersive surgical training: translating advances in gaming technology into extended-reality surgical simulation training programmes. British Journal of Surgery, 2022, 109(5): 470-471.
[12] DENG Feng, et al. PINN-AMR: Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Adaptive Mesh Refinement. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 415: 116298.
[13] PAN Shao Wu, STEVEN Brunton, and NATHAN Kutz. Neural implicit flow: a mesh-agnostic dimensionality reduction paradigm of spatio-temporal data. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2023, 24(41): 1-60.
[14] ASHOK Mona, et al. Ethical framework for artificial intelligence and digital technologies. International Journal of Information Management, 2022, 62: 102433.
[15] GILES Michael. Multilevel monte carlo path simulation. Operations research, 2008, 56(3): 607-617.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







