Dynamic Succession of Ecosystem Services in Rural Areas: Trade-offs, Synergies, and Driving Mechanisms

Xinyi Liu

doi:10.62051/ijnres.v8n6.05

Authors

Xinyi Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v8n6.05

Keywords:

Ecosystem services; Rural areas; Trade-offs/synergies; Driving mechanisms.

Abstract

The intensification of urbanization has exacerbated the conflict between the stability of rural ecosystems and economic development. Understanding the dynamic succession of ecosystem services (ESs) in rural areas is essential for achieving regional ecological sustainability. This study assessed seven ESs in the rural areas of Hangzhou from 2000 to 2020, analyzing their spatiotemporal evolution characteristics, dynamic changes in trade-offs/synergies, and driving mechanisms. The results showed that: (1) ESs exhibited a spatial distribution pattern characterized by “high in the southwest and low in the northeast.” Soil conservation and cultural services showed an overall upward trend, water yield and water purification first increased and then declined, while carbon storage, habitat quality, and food production declined continuously. (2) Among the 21 ES pairs, eight exhibited significant correlations, with notable changes observed in pairs related to food production, cultural services, and habitat quality. (3) Among the prominent trade-off/synergy pairs, socio-economic factors were identified as the dominant drivers of changes in ES trade-offs/synergies in Hangzhou‘s rural areas.

References

[1] Daily, C. G. (1999). Developing a scientific basis for managing Earth's life support systems. Conservation Ecology, 3.

[2] Robert, C., Ralph, D. A., & Rudolf, D. G. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387.

[3] M. B, E., D. P, G., & J. G, L. (2009). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12.

[4] C. R-H., D. P, G., & M. B, E. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107.

[5] Wang, S., & Liu, S. (2019). Ecosystem service relationships: Formation and recommended approaches from a systematic review. Ecological Indicators, 99.

[6] Jiang, Y., Li, R., & Hu, K. (2022). Driving factors of the variation of ecosystem service and the trade-off and synergistic relationships in typical karst basin. Ecological Indicators, 142.

[7] Chen, D., Liu, X., Liu, T., et al. (2025). Exploring spatio-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions in rapidly urbanizing areas: Trade-offs/synergistic changes and their driving mechanisms. Ecological Indicators, 181.

[8] Chen, H., Sun, J., & Jiang, H. (2023). Inequity in housing welfare: Assessing the inter-city performance of China’s housing provident fund program. Land, 12.

[9] Chen, S., & Wang, J. (2024). The driving factors of the tradeoff-synergistic relationship among forest ecosystem service values in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Forests, 15.

[10] Wang, J. F., Zhang, T. L., & Fu, B. J. (2016). A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecological Indicators, 67.

[11] Yang, C., Xia, H., Gu, Q., et al. (2024). Predicting water ecosystem services under prospective climate and land-use change scenarios in typical watersheds distributed across China. Ecological Indicators, 159.

[12] Pi, X., Zou, Y., & Hu, Z. (2026). How land use and GDP interact to shape ecosystem services trade-offs. Landscape Ecology, 41.

[13] Du, E., & Wang, Y. (2020). Attribution analysis for water yield service based on the geographical detector method: A case study of the Hengduan Mountain region. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30.

[14] Zhang, X., Miguel, B., Tadeo, S-S., et al. (2025). Temperature thresholds induce abrupt shifts in biodiversity and ecosystem services in montane ecosystems worldwide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122.

[15] Zhang, X., Pan, C., & Ma, S. T. (2019). Management-induced greenhouse gases emission mitigation in global rice production. Science of the Total Environment, 649.

[16] Du, Y., Kong, W., & Ren, Z. (2024). Green or grain? Impact of green space expansion on grain production in Chinese cities and its implications for national urban greening schemes. Landscape Ecology, 39.

[17] Sun, J. (2026). Embedding payments for ecosystem services within the conservation-development nexus in China's Qingshan Village. Territory, Politics, Governance, 14.