Temporal Responses of Spontaneous Plant Community Diversity to Sowing Density of Cultivated Herbs in Park Greenspaces

Yuyan Wu

doi:10.62051/

Authors

Yuyan Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/

Keywords:

Sowing density; Spontaneous plants; Urban park greenspaces; Seasonal dynamics; Plant diversity; Community composition.

Abstract

Understanding how sowing density influences spontaneous plant communities over time is critical for optimizing vegetation management in urban park greenspaces. This study investigated the temporal responses of spontaneous plant community diversity to varying sowing densities of cultivated herbs in Hangzhou, China. A semi-controlled field experiment was conducted using three sowing densities (20, 100, and 200 plants m⁻²), and spontaneous plant communities were monitored monthly from December to May. Diversity was assessed using the Shannon–Wiener index, Pielou’s evenness index, and Margalef’s richness index, and the data were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. Spontaneous plant diversity exhibited clear seasonal dynamics, with diversity indices increasing from winter to spring and peaking in March–April. The effects of sowing density were strongly time-dependent. Differences among density treatments were relatively small during the initial stages but became more pronounced during the spring growth period. Specifically, medium and high densities were associated with lower diversity and species richness during the peak period. In contrast, evenness was primarily influenced by temporal variation rather than sowing density. Community composition varied among treatments, mainly through shifts in species abundance rather than species turnover. These findings indicate that sowing density can serve as a practical tool for regulating spontaneous plant diversity and highlight March–April as a key period for management interventions in park greenspaces.

References

[1] Prach, K. (2001). The role of spontaneous vegetation succession in ecosystem restoration. Applied Vegetation Science, 4(1), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2001.tb00241.x

[2] Gao, Z., Song, K., Pan, Y., Malkinson, D., Zhang, X., Jia, B., Xia, T., Guo, X., Liang, H., Huang, S., Da, L., Van Bodegom, P. M., & Cieraad, E. (2021). Drivers of spontaneous plant richness patterns in urban green space within a biodiversity hotspot. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61, 127098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127098

[3] Bonthoux, S., Voisin, L., & Bouché-Pillon, S. (2019). More than weeds: Spontaneous vegetation in streets as a neglected element of urban biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 185, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.009

[4] de la Fuente de Val, G. (2023). The effect of spontaneous wild vegetation on landscape preferences in urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 81, 127863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127863

[5] Luo, S., & Patuano, A. (2023). Multiple ecosystem services of informal green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 81, 127849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127849

[6] Hitchmough, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). The dynamics of designed plant communities of rosette forming forbs for use in supra-urban drainage swales. Landscape and Urban Planning, 117, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.018

[7] Jiang, M., & Hitchmough, J. D. (2022). Can sowing density facilitate a higher level of forb abundance, biomass, and richness in urban, wildflower meadows? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 74, 127657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127657

[8] Hitchmough, J. D. (2017). The plant community: A model for horticultural thought and practice in the 21st century. International Society for Horticultural Science.

[9] Hautier, Y., Niklaus, P. A., & Hector, A. (2009). Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication. Science, 324(5927), 636–638. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169640

[10] Hitchmough, J., Wagner, M., & Ahmad, H. (2017). Extended flowering and high weed resistance within two layer designed perennial “prairie-meadow” vegetation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 27, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.022

[11] Postma, J. A. (2021). Dividing the pie: A quantitative review on plant density responses. Plant, Cell & Environment, 44(4), 1072–1094. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13968

[12] Johnson, L. R., & Handel, S. N. (2019). Management intensity steers the long-term fate of ecological restoration in urban woodlands. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.02.008