Environmental Factors that Shape the Behavior of White Rhinoceros in a Captive Setting in Yunnan, China

Yuchen Zhang

doi:10.62051/ijnres.v7n3.09

Authors

Yuchen Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v7n3.09

Keywords:

White rhinoceros; behavior; Environmental influences; Conservation strategies; Animal welfare.

Abstract

Understanding the determinants of rhinoceros behavior is important in field and enclosure management, particularly during global climate change. In this study, the influence of five central environmental parameters (ambient temperature, relative humidity, temperature–humidity index (THI), light intensity, and wind speed behavior) on white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) behavior was examined in captivity in Yunnan, China. Special attention was given to the rhino behavior walking, given it was the most frequently reported active behavior (e.g. excluding resting) and because this activity shapes intra and interspecific interactions and carries high energy costs. Results show there to be a highly significant positive relationship between THI and walking duration, while wind speed and light intensity contributed relatively weakly. The findings stress the importance of thermal environment in shaping locomotor activity. While future research is required to extrapolate these findings to more extensive populations and to understand the influence of seasonality on rhino behavior, this study presents the valuable quantitative evidence on environmental determinants of captive white rhinoceros behavior in China and offers guidance for future husbandry, welfare assessment, and restoration planning.

References

[1]Morales, J. A. (2022). Climate: Climate variability and climate change. In Coastal geology (pp. 375-388). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

[2]Dilmore, R., & Zhang, L. (2017). Greenhouse gases and their role in climate change. Greenhouse Gases and Clay Minerals: Enlightening Down-to-Earth Road Map to Basic Science of Clay-Greenhouse Gas Interfaces, 15-32.

[3]Rohde, R. (2025, January 10; updated March 19). Global Temperature Report for 2024. Berkeley Earth. Retrieved [insert retrieval date], from https://berkeleyearth.org/global-temperature-report-for-2024/

[4]Karaer, Mina Cansu, Nina Čebulj-Kadunc, and Tomaž Snoj. "Stress in wildlife: comparison of the stress response among domestic, captive, and free-ranging animals." Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10 (2023): 1167016.

[5]Rotach, Peter. "In situ conservation methods." Conservation and Management of Forest Genetic Resources in Europe. Arbora, Zvolen, Slovakia (2005): 535-565.

[6]Rotach, P. (2005). In situ conservation methods. Conservation and Management of Forest Genetic Resources in Europe. Arbora, Zvolen, Slovakia, 535-565.

[7]Rose, Lisa. "Behavioral sampling in the field: continuous focal versus focal interval sampling." Behaviour 137.2 (2000): 153-180.

[8]Balancing act: The strengths and limitations of Observation Method. Journalism University (2025) Journalism & Mass Communication Hub. Available at: https://journalism.university/communication-research-methods/strengths-limitations-observation-method/ (Accessed: 10 September 2025).

[9]Habeeb, Alsaied Alnaimy, Ahmed Elsayed Gad, and Mostafa Abas Atta. "Temperature-humidity indices as indicators to heat stress of climatic conditions with relation to production and reproduction of farm animals." International Journal of Biotechnology and Recent Advances 1.1 (2018): 35-50.

[10]Mota-Rojas, Daniel, et al. "Physiological and behavioral mechanisms of thermoregulation in mammals." Animals 11.6 (2021): 1733.

[11]Van Weeghel, H. J. E., et al. "Good animal welfare by design: An approach to incorporate animal capacities in engineering design." Agricultural Systems 191 (2021): 103154.

[12]Negowetti, Nicole E. "Establishing and enforcing animal welfare labeling claims: Improving transparency and ensuring accountability." J. Animal & Nat. Resource L. 14 (2018): 131.

[13]Land, C. E. (1981). Statistical limitations in relation to sample size. Environmental Health Perspectives, 42, 15-21.

[14]Canteloup, Charlotte, et al. "The effects of data collection and observation methods on uncertainty of social networks in wild primates." American journal of primatology 82.7 (2020): e23137.

[15]Kim, So-Hyeon, Do-Hyeun Kim, and Hee-Dong Park. "Animal situation tracking service using RFID, GPS, and sensors." 2010 Second International Conference on Computer and Network Technology. IEEE, 2010.

[16]Diana, A., Salas, M., Pereboom, Z., Mendl, M., & Norton, T. (2021). A systematic review of the use of technology to monitor welfare in zoo animals: is there space for improvement?. Animals, 11(11), 3048.

[17]Renaudeau, D., Collin, A., Yahav, S., De Basilio, V., Gourdine, J. L., & Collier, R. J. (2012). Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. animal, 6(5), 707-728.