Numerical Simulation of Single Tooth Rock Breaking Mechanism Under High Temperature Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v7n3.02Keywords:
High temperature geothermal well; PDC bit; Rock breaking mechanism; Numerical simulation.Abstract
In high-temperature geothermal drilling, due to the high hardness and strong abrasiveness of the formation rock, and the rock drillability is significantly reduced in high-temperature environments, the working efficiency of traditional PDC drill bits decreases, and it is necessary to further explore the rock-breaking mechanism under high-temperature conditions. To this end, the research systematically examined the influence of high temperature on the single-tooth rock breaking process. Through numerical simulation, the effect of temperature on the single-tooth cutting process was explored. The results show that as the temperature increases, the rock damage first decreases and then increases. The damage is minimal at 200°C. The weakened rock strength at high temperature helps to improve the rock breaking efficiency. The Cpress stress of the tooth edge increases from the lowest point on both sides and is symmetrically distributed. The contact area is about 50°. The stress is the highest and fluctuates the most at 200°C, which is easy to cause uneven wear and is not conducive to the life of the cutting teeth. If the temperature continues to increase, the stress distribution will tend to Uniform; the increase in rake angle leads to the expansion of the high-temperature zone on the tooth surface, intensification of stress and fluctuations, and aggravates unbalanced wear; the increase in penetration increases the Cpress stress, expands the contact area, and intensifies stress fluctuations, which also affects the life of the cutting teeth. Tooth profile comparison shows that 3D tooth profiles such as roof teeth and Mercedes-Benz teeth have the advantages of large rock damage, high rock breaking efficiency, and small stress fluctuations in high-temperature and high-abrasive formations, and are more suitable for high-temperature geothermal drilling. The research results provide key theoretical support and parameter basis for the optimal design of high-temperature geothermal drill bits.
References
[1]Shulyupin A N. Steam-water flow instability in geothermal wells [J]. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2015, 22 (4):475-480.
[2]Zha Yongjin, Feng Xiaowei, Ge Yunhua, Chen Zhixue. Progress in high-temperature geothermal power drilling technology [J]. Science and Technology Herald, 2012, (32):51-54.
[3]Gioia Falcone. Oil and Gas Expertise for Geothermal Exploitation: The Need for Technology Transfer [C]. SPE 113852, 2008.
[4]Bi Yurong. Review of current status and prospects of geothermal resource development and application[J]. Petroleum and petrochemical energy conservation, 2011, (10): 7-11.
[5]Li Jifei. Simulation research and performance analysis of hot dry rock power generation technology[J]. Shandong Chemical Industry,2021,50(09):114-119.
[6]Zhang Jie, Zhao Meng, Niu Shiwei. Progress and development trends of key technologies for hot dry rock EGS [J]. District heating, 2021(02): 79-84.
[7]Hu Shukai, Tian Feng, Li Hanyue, et al. Development and application of high-efficiency wear-resistant PDC drill bits for ultra-high temperature geothermal drilling [J]. Drilling and Production Technology, 2020, 43(03): 1-3+141.
[8]Lukawski M Z, Silverman R L, Tester J W. Uncertainty analysis of geothermal well drilling and completion costs [J]. Geothermics, 2016, 64: 382-391.
[9]Frolova J V,Ladygin V M, Rychagov S N. Petrophysical alteration of volcanic rocks in hydrothermal systems of the kuril-kamchatla Island Arc[C]. World Geothermal Conpress, 2010.
[10]Greg Bignall. Taupo volcanic zone deep geothermal drilling project [EB/OL]. http://www.gns.cri.nz/ content/download/6786/37092/file/2-3_HADES_May2011_Bignall_GNS-Science.pdf
[11]Guang Xinjun, Wang Minsheng, Sina, et al. Difficulties and countermeasures in high-temperature geothermal high-efficiency development drilling technology [C]. Proceedings of the 18th National Exploration Engineering (Geotechnical Drilling Engineering) Technology Academic Exchange Annual Conference. Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. 2015.
[12]Zuo Ruqiang. Overview of the progress of international oil and gas well drill bits (Part 3) - PDC drill bit development process and current situation (Part 1) [J]. Exploration Engineering, 2016, 43(3): 1-8
[13]Zuo Ruqiang. Overview of the progress of international oil and gas well drill bits (4) - PDC drill bit development process and current situation (Part 2) [J]. Exploration Engineering (Geotechnical Drilling Engineering), 2016(04): 40-48.
[14]Scott DAN. A bit of history: Overcoming early setbacks, PDC bits now drill 90%-plus of worldwide footage[J]. Drilling Contractor anthology series—PDC drilling bits. Houston, TX: IADC, 2015: 1-7.
[15]Andersen E E, Azar J J. PDC Bit Performance Under Simulated Borehole Conditions[J]. Drilling & Completion, 1993, 8: 184-188.
[16]Zhu Lihong, Chen Zepeng, Huang Yong, Qiang Wei, Wang Jingyin. Experimental study on the anti-adhesion performance of the non-smooth surface of the PDC drill bit body[J]. Laboratory research and exploration, 2018, 37(10): 27-30.
[17]Robert H Frushour, Devonshire, Ann Arbor. Composite polycrystalline diamond compact with improved impact and thermal stability [P], USA: United States Patent 5645617,1997.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xian Ye, Qingchun Gao, Xuan Zhang, Shengxu Liu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







