Optimizing the Components of Active Water Fracturing Fluids for Coalbed Methane Using Biochemical Engineering Approaches

Hong Zhang

doi:10.62051/ijnres.v6n1.07

Authors

Hong Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v6n1.07

Keywords:

Coalbed Gas Bioengineering; Active Water Fracturing; Composition Optimization; Dissolved Organic Matter; Metabolic Pathway.

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is an effective technique for enhancing coal seam permeability. While coal as a macromolecular organic material, can be biodegraded by microorganisms, limited research has explored the integration of these processes to develop bioactive fracturing fluids. This study employed Shengli lignite from Inner Mongolia as the substrate and coal seam mine water as the microbial inoculum. Through single-factor experiments and orthogonal experimental design, investigated the effects of wetting agent concentration, clay stabilizer concentration, and demulsifier concentration in bioactive fracturing fluid additives on the microbial methanogenesis of lignite. The results indicate that, in terms of their impact on gas production, the three factors rank in descending order of significance as follows: wetting agent concentration, clay stabilizer concentration, and demulsifier concentration. Orthogonal analysis identified the optimal additive combination for bioactive fracturing fluid as 0.15% wetting agent, 2% clay stabilizer, and 0.15% demulsifier by mass concentration. The optimized formulation led to a substantial 31.73% increase in biogas yield compared to the pre-optimized condition. Three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy revealed that the fluorescence intensity of fulvic acid-like and humic acid-like substances was higher after optimization, indicating more complete degradation of the coal samples. Furthermore, metagenomic sequencing analysis demonstrated that the optimized bioactive fracturing fluid significantly improved the microbial community structure, markedly increasing the abundance of Methanosarcina. The predominant methane metabolism pathways were acetate fermentation and carbon dioxide reduction, with a substantial increase in the gene abundance related to methanogenic pathways, thereby promoting microbial methane production. These findings elucidate the mechanistic effects of bioactive fracturing fluid composition on lignite biogasification and provid.

References

[1]Wen Bojie, Chen Yuchuan, Wang Gaoshang, et al. China’s Demand for Energy and Mineral Resourcesby 2035[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2019, 21(01) : 68-73.

[2]QIN Yong, SHEN Jian, SHI Rui. Strategic value and choice on construction of large CMG industry in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(01) : 371-387.

[3]LI Yang, ZHANG Yuanyuan, XUE Sheng, et al. Actinobacteria may influence biological methane generation in coal seams[J]. Fuel, 2023, 339: 126917.

[4]XIA Daping, HUANG Song, GAO Zhixiang, et al. Effect of different inorganic iron compounds on the biological methanation of CO2 sequestered in coal seams[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 164: 948-955.

[5]ZHOU Yinbo, ZHANG Ruilin, TIAN Kunyun, et al. Characteristics of the methanotroph used in coalbed methane emission reduction：Methane oxidation efficiency and coal wettability[J]. Fuel, 2023, 349: 128596.

[6]SMITH H.J. , SCHWEITZER H.D. , BARNHART E.P. , et al. Effect of an algal amendment on the microbial conversion of coal to methane at different sulfate concentrations from the Powder River Basin, USA[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2021, 248: 103860.

[7]LUO Weijiang, NING Chongru, HUANG Kai. Current Situation and Prospect of Research on CoalbedMethane Fracturing Fluid.

[8]WANG Qian, SONG Jinxing, SI Qing, et al. Applicability of Surfactant in Fracturing Fluid Containing Microorganisms[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(01) : 49-52+56.

[9]Yang Li, Shuheng Tang, Songhang Zhang, et al. In situ analysis of methanogenic pathways and biogeochemical features of CBM co-produced water from the Shizhuangnan block in the southern Qinshui Basin, China[J]. Energy Fuels, 2020, 34(05) : 5466–5475.

[10]Yuran Zhang，Roland N. Horne，Adam J. Hawkins，et al. Geological activity shapes the microbiome in deep-subsurface aquifers by advection[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，2022，119(25) : e2113985119.

[11]Yueguo Li, Haijiao Fu, Detian Yan, et al. Effects of simulated surface freshwater environment on in situ microorganisms and their methanogenesis after tectonic uplift of a deep coal seam[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2022, 257: 104014.

[12]HAN Ziyi, ZHOU Yongqiang, GENG Chunnü. Characterization of the Sources and Composition of Dissolved Organic Matter in the High Occurrence Area of Algal Blooms in Northern Lake Taihu[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2024, 44(12) : 3568-3575.

[13]LI Wen, LI Xuan, HAN Chunxiao, et al. A new view into three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy for dissolved organic matter[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 855: 158963.

[14]ZHAO Li, ZHAO Maoyuan, GAO Wenfang, et al. Different Bacillus sp. play different roles on humic acid during lignocellulosic biomass composting[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434: 139901.

[15]Guo HY, Zhang ML, Dong ZW, et al. The mechanisms of biogenic methane metabolism by synergistic biodegradation of coal and corn straw[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 298: 122577.

[16]Jabari L, Gannoun H, Cayol JL, et al. Macellibacteroides fermentans gen. nov. , sp. nov. , a member of the family Porphyromonadaceae isolated from an upflow anaerobic filter treating abattoir wastewaters[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2012, 62: 2522-2527.

[17]CAI Yuheng, CHENG Kai. Optimization of aerobic growth conditions of a Stutzerimonas stutzeri agent and its partial denitrification performance[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University(Natural Sciences) , 2024, 58(02) : 184-196.

[18]Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2002, 184(04) : 1140-1154.

[19]Ma J, Xu L, Jia LY. Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas sp. BA2 isolated from active sewage sludge of chemical plant[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2012, 24(12) : 2141-2148.

[20]Bai XR, Nie MQ, Diwu ZJ, et al. Extraction and purification of 2-hydroxymuconic semialdehyde accumulated in phenol degradation by Pseudomonas stutzeri N2[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 419: 129444.

[21]HE Jie, LI Zongming, YANG Zhengyu, et al. Effects of combined application of cowmanure and chemical fertilizer on CH4 and N2O emissions in paddy fields with double-rice cropping [J]. Ecology and EnvironmentalSciences, 2024, 33(4) : 573-584.

[22]Mitchell AM, Baldwin DS. The effects of sediment desiccation on the potential for nitrification，denitrification，and methanogenesis in an Australian reservoir[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1999, 392: 3-11.

[23]Chen KC, Lin YF, Houng JY. Performance of a continuous stirred tank reactor with immobilized denitrifiers and methanogens[J]. Water Environment Research, 1997, 69(02) : 233-239.

[24]ZHANG Mingzhu, WU Xuefeng, MU Dongdong, et al. High throughput sequencing-based analysis of prokaryotic communitystructure in Chinese liquor fermentation pit muds and its correlation with physicochemical indexes[J]. Food Science, 2021, 42(18) : 111-118.

[25]Su XB, Zhao WZ, Xia DP. The diversity of hydrogen-producing bacteria and methanogens within an in situ coal seam[J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2018, 11: 245.

[26]REN Shijie, KONG Lingdou, LIU Jun, et al. Advances in classification and metabolic pathways of methanogenic acchaea[J]. China Biotechnology, 2024, 44(09) : 100-112.

[27]Hongyu Guo, Shufeng Zhao, Daping Xia, et al. The biochemical mechanism of enhancing the conversion of chicken manure to biogenic methane using coal slime as additive[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 344: 126226.

[28]Hongyu Guo, Wenqing Jia, Zhenhong Chen, et al. Analysis on methane production from various coal slime fermentations based on metagenomics[J]. Jourmal of Environmental Management, 2023, 343: 118058.

[29]LIU Wei, SHI Xuan, XU Dongwei, et al. Effect of flow velocity on methane and sulfide formation in sewage pipes [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023, 43(06): 2938-2947.

[30]HUANG Rui, TANG Chuyan, SONG Yuanxu, et al. Research progress on the interaction mechanisms between methanogenicarchaea and electron mediators[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2023, 29(02): 271-280.

[31]ZHOU Yixuan, SU Xianbo, ZHAO Weizhong, et al. Enhancement of bioconversion of coal to methane by graphene[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(11): 4145-4156.