Degradation of Ethanol and Ethanethiol By Methanosarcina Horinobensis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v5n3.11Keywords:
Methanosarcina horinobensis; Ethanol; 2-Ethylthiol; H2S; CH4.Abstract
In this study, Methanosarcina horinobensis was used as the object to explore the degradation mechanism of sulfur-containing small molecular organics (ethanethiol, ethanol, etc.) and the formation process of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methane (CH4) under strict anaerobic conditions. Through anaerobic fermentation experiments, combined with gas chromatograph and ion chromatograph analysis of gas and liquid phase composition changes, it was found that when ethanol was used as the substrate, the methanogenic capacity of the flora reached a peak at 14~26 days, and the cumulative gas production was 21.317 mL/g, and the concentration of CO2 fluctuated. When ethanethiol was used as the substrate, the production of H 2 S reached the peak (6.78 mL/g ) in the first 4 days of fermentation, and the production of CH was weak (0.00116 mL/g), and the peak period of the two was consistent. The liquid phase analysis showed that the concentration change of sulfur-containing inorganic ions (such as SO42- and S2O32- ) was not directly related to the formation of H2S, suggesting that the degradation of ethanethiol directly generated H2S and CH4. The study revealed that the strain catalyzed the decomposition of methyl compounds by methyltransferase, and used HS-CoM as an electron donor to convert methyl groups into CH4, accompanied by the formation of H2S. The conclusion shows that methanogens can directly use sulfur-containing methyl compounds, which provides a theoretical basis for revealing the biological origin and control technology of H2S in coal seams.
References
[1] IranpourR Cox H H J, Fan S, et al. 2005.Short-term and long-term effects of increasing temperatures on the stability and the production of volatile sulfur compounds in full-scale thermophilic anaerobic digesters[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 91(2): 199-212.
[2] Karnofski M A. 1975.Odor generation in the kraft process[J]. Journal of Chemical Education, 52(8): 490
[3] Sipma J, Svitelskaya A, Mark B V D, et al. 2005. Potentials of biological oxidation processes for the treatment of spent sulfidic caustics containing thiols[J]. Water Research, 38(20): 4331-4340.
[4] Smet E, Van Langenhove H. 1998.Abatement of volatile organic sulfur compounds in odorous emissions from the bio-industry[J]. Biodegradation, 9(3/4): 273-284.
[5] Bosch P L F V D, Graaff M D, Fortuny-Picornell M, et al.2009.Inhibition of microbiological sulfide oxidation by methanethiol and dimethyl polysulfides at natron-alkaline conditions[J]. Applied Microbiology&Biotechnology, 83(3): 579-587.
[6] Calderon, B., Aracil, I., Fullana, A., 2012. Deodorization of a gas stream containing dimethyl disulfide with zero-valent iron nanoparticles.Chem.Eng.J.
[7] He, C., Li, X. Z., Sharma, V. K. ,Li, S. Y., 2009. Elimination of sludge odor by oxidizing sulfur-containing compounds with ferrate(VI). Environ. Sci. Technol.
[8] T. Fotiou, T. M. Triantis, T. Kaloudis, et al.Photocatalytic degradation of water taste and odour compounds in the presence of polyoxometalates and TiO2:Intermediates and degradation pathways[J]. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2014, 286: 1-9.
[9] J. B. Raina, E. A. Dinsdale, B. L. Willis, et al. Do the organic sulfur compounds DMSP and DMS drive coral microbial associations?[J]. Trends Microbiol, 2010, 18(3): 101-108.
[10] N. M. Levine, V. A. Varaljay, D. A. Toole, et al.Environmental,biochemical and genetic drivers of DMSP degradation and DMS production in the Sargasso Sea[J]. Environ Microbiol, 2012, 14(5): 1210-1223.
[11] W.Du and W.Parker.Modeling volatile organic sulfur compounds in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of methionine[J].Water Research,2012,46(2):539-546.
[12] Ye, Zhu, Cai et al., 2017.Screening of methanthiol-degrading bacteria and their degradation characteristics [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 37 (7): 2572-2578.
[13] Sipma J,Svitelskaya A,Mark B V D, et al. 2005. Potentials of biological oxidation processes for the treatment of spent sulfidic caustics containing thiols[J]. Water Research,38(20):4331-4340.
[14] ZINDER S H, BROCK T D. Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Hydrogen Sulfide Production from the Terminal Methiol Group of Methionine by Anaerobic Lake Sediments[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1978, 35: 344-352.
[15] ZINDER S H, BROCK T D. Production of methane and carbon dioxode from methane thiol and dimethyl sulphide by anaerobic lake sediments[J]. Nature, 1978, 273: 226-228.
[16] KIENE R P, OREMLAND R S, CATENA A, et al. Metabolism of Reduced Methylated Sulfur Compounds in Anaerobic Sediments and by a Pure Culture of an Estuarine Methanogen[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1986, 52: 1037-1045.
[17] ZINDER, S. H. & BROCK, T. D. (1978~). Dimethyl sulphoxide reduction by micro-organisms. Journal of General Microbiology 105,335-342.
[18] BAMFORTH, C. W. (1980). Dimethyl sulphoxide reduc-tase of Saccharomvces spp. FEMS Microbiology Letters 7, 55-59.
[19] RAJAGOPAL B S, DANIELS L. Investigation of mercaptans, organic sulfides, and inorganic sulfur compounds as sulfur sources for the growth of methanogenic bacteria[J]. Current Microbiology, 1986, 14: 137-144.
[20] KRöGER A, KLIMMEK O, VANDAMME P, et al. Wolinella [M]. Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. 2015: 1-7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kaida She

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







