Tectonic Physical Simulation Experiments: Evolution from Qualitative Exploration to Quantitative Analysis and Future Prospects

Qinzhi Li

doi:10.62051/ijnres.v3n2.01

Authors

Qinzhi Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v3n2.01

Keywords:

Tectonic Physical Simulation Experiments; Geological Structures; Similarity Principles; Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV); Quantitative Analysis.

Abstract

This review synthesizes the historical development, research methodologies, and current scientific issues of tectonic physical simulation experiments, while also looking forward to future research directions in the field. Since the early 19th century when James Hall first simulated fold formation, the field has undergone a transition from qualitative studies to quantitative analysis. We analyze key research and technological advancements across the early exploration, mid-term development, and late maturation stages, with a particular focus on the introduction and application of the similarity principles, as well as the incorporation of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technology. Despite significant progress, challenges remain in the selection of experimental materials, precise application of similarity principles, and experimental precision. Future research should explore new materials, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the application of big data technology to enhance the accuracy and reliability of simulation experiments.

References

[1] Adam J, Klinkmüller M, Schreurs G, et al. 2013. Quantitative 3D strain analysis in analogue experiments simulating tectonic deformation: Integration of X-ray computed tomography and digital volume correlation techniques[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 55: 127-149.

[2] Adam J, Urai J L, Wieneke B, et al. 2005. Shear localisation and strain distribution during tectonic faulting—New insights from granular-flow experiments and high-resolution optical image correlation techniques[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 27(2): 283-301.

[3] Chemenda A I, Cavalie O, Vergnolle M, et al., 2016. Numerical model of formation of a 3-D strike-slip fault system[J]. Comptes Rendus – Géoscience, 348(1): 61-69.

[4] Del Castello M, Pini G A, Mcclay K R. 2002. The effect of tectonic overloading on strain partitioning of doubly-vergent Coulomb wedges: a 2D-3D sand-box modelling approach[J]. Bollettino di Geofisica, Teorica ed Applicata(No.1-2): 166-170.

[5] Dobrin, Milton B. 1941. Some quantitative experiments on a fluid salt-dome model and their geological implications[J]. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 22(2): 528.

[6] Graveleau F, Strak V, Dominguez S, et al. 2015. Experimental modelling of tectonics–erosion–sedimentation interactions in compressional, extensional, and strike–slip settings[J]. Geomorphology, 244: 146-168.

[7] Henza A A, Withjack M, Schlische R W. 2010. Normal-fault development during two phases of non-coaxial extension:An experimental study[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 32(11): 1656-1667.

[8] Hubbert M K. 1951. Mechanical basis for certain familiar geologic structures[J]. Bull.geol.soc.amer, 62(4): 355-372.

[9] Krantz R W. 1991. Measurements of friction coefficients and cohesion for faulting and fault reactivation in laboratory models using sand and sand mixtures[J]. Tectonophysics, 188(1): 203-207.

[10] Mcclay K R, White M J. 1995. Analogue modelling of orthogonal and oblique rifting[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 12(2): 137-151.