Study on the Effect of Inoculation of Mixed Inoculation on Hydrolysis and Acidification Performance of Kitchen Waste

Yuanming Huang; Songke Yu; Jialun Hu; Jinmei Peng; Wei Peng; Jianwei Dong; Xinqing Ning

doi:10.62051/ijnres.v2n2.08

Authors

Yuanming Huang
Songke Yu
Jialun Hu
Jinmei Peng
Wei Peng
Jianwei Dong
Xinqing Ning

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v2n2.08

Keywords:

Mixed inoculum, kitchen waste, hydrolysis acidification, ethanol.

Abstract

The effect of a mixture of different inoculants as inoculum on the hydrolytic and acidification process was investigated in order to improve the hydrolytic and acidification properties of kitchen waste. The results showed that the inoculation of Baijiu pit mud had the feasibility to improve the hydrolytic acidification performance during the hydrolytic acidification process of kitchen waste. At the end of the hydrolytic acidification process, the SCOD of the 1:0, 3:1,1:1, and 1;3 group increased by 55.97%, 48.67%, 30.82% and 7.03%, respectively, compared with that of the 1:0 group; the hydrolysis rate increased by 2.44%, 7.07%, 2.01% and 2.2% compared with that of the 0:1 group. The highest concentration of VFAs was found in the group with 1:3 ratio of Baijiu pit mud and anaerobic sludge, which was 11353.46 mg/L. The highest acidification rate was found in the 1:3 group, which was 68.57%, and 16.14% higher than that in the 1:0 group. The highest concentration of VFAs was found in the group with 1:3 ratio of Baijiu pit mud and anaerobic sludge, which was 11353.46 mg/L. The highest acidification rate was found in the 1:3 group, which was 68.57%, and 16.14% higher than that in the 1:0 group. Inoculation of Baijiu pit mud was able to change the fraction of VFAs during the hydrolytic acidification of kitchen waste. The fermentation type of the hydrolytic acidification system was ethanol-type fermentation, and the ethanol concentration was increased by 8.64, 8.59, 7.36, and 2.81 times in the groups with the ratio of Baijiu pit mud to anaerobic sludge of 1:0, 3:1, and 1:1, respectively. However, in the Baijiu pit mud and anaerobic sludge ratio of 1:3 and 0:1 group, the main type of fermentation was acetic acid type fermentation. The experimental groups inoculated with Baijiu pit mud.

References

Cheng Q., Huang W., Jiang M., et al. Challenges of anaerobic digestion in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2021,18(11):1-12.

Chew K.R., Leong H.Y., Khoo K.S., et al. Effects of anaerobic digestion of on biogas production and environmental impacts: a review[J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2021,19(4): 2921–2939.

Amornpan T., Chettaphong P., Kanyarat S.,Leu S.Y., et al. Biochemical Methane Potential Assay Using Single Versus Dual Sludge Inocula and Gap in Energy Recovery from Napier Grass Digestion[J]. BioEnergy Research,2020, 13(4):1-9.

Jessica K.H.P., Priscila L.B.B.,Arthur R.T., et al. Optimization of methane production parameters during anaerobic co-digestion of and garden waste[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,272(1):1231301～1231307.

Jacqueline H.E., Rodrigo A.L., Jeffrey S.L., et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of commercial and dairy manure: Characterizing biochemical parameters and synergistic effects[J]. Waste Management,2016,52: 286-294.

Xin K., Yu S.Y., Xu S., et al. Effect of Fe 0 addition on volatile fatty acids evolution on anaerobic digestion at high organic loading rates[J]. Waste Management,2018,71:719-727.

Xing B.S., Sifan C., Yule H., et al. Stable and high-rate anaerobic co-digestion of and cow manure: Optimisation of start-up conditions[J]. Bioresource Technology,2020,307(2020):123195-123195.

Miguel R.C.O., Luis F.M.R.,Patricia T.L. Identification of Factors and Variables that Influence the Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Biowaste and [J]. Waste and Biomass Valorization,2020,12(2020):1-16.

Amornpan T., Chettaphong P., Kanyarat S., et al. Biochemical Methane Potential Assay Using Single Versus Dual Sludge Inocula and Gap in Energy Recovery from Napier Grass Digestion[J]. BioEnergy Research,2020,13(4):1-9.

Fan B.Q., Xiang L.P., Yu Y.G., et al. Solid-state fermentation with pretreated rice husk: Green technology for the distilled spirit (Baijiu) production[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation,2020,20(15-16):101049-101057

Liu Y.B, Xu M.Y., Zhao Z.J., et al. Analysis on bacterial community structure of new and old fermented pit mud of Shedian Liquor[J]. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment,2022,36(1):653-661.

Lu M., Zhou We., Ji F., et al. Profiling prokaryotic community in pit mud of Chinese strong-aroma type liquor by using oligotrophic culturing[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology,2021,337:108951-108966.

Zou W., Zhao C.Q., Luo H.B. Diversity and Function of Microbial Community in Chinese Strong-Flavor Baijiu Ecosystem: A Review [J]. Frontiers in microbiology,2018,9:671-686.

Zheng Q., Lin B., Wang Y.B, et al. Proteomic and high-throughput analysis of protein expression and microbial diversity of microbes from 30- and 300-year pit muds of Chinese Luzhou-flavor liquor [J]. Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.),2015,75:305-314.

Gao J.J., Qin J.J., Ye F.P., et al. Constructing simplified microbial consortia to improve the key flavour compounds during strong aroma-type Baijiu fermentation[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology,2022,369:109594-109594.