Review of service robot technology acceptance model research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijmee.v1n1.04Keywords:
Service robot, technology acceptance model, Perceived ease of use, Perceived usefulnessAbstract
With the continuous progress of science and technology, service robots have gradually penetrated into various industries, including catering, travel, home and medical fields. The rapid development of this technology has attracted wide attention in today's society, involving artificial intelligence, machine learning, and human-computer interaction, and has brought major changes to our lives and work. However, the adoption of new technologies is not always smooth, and the level of acceptance varies. This paper takes the technology acceptance model (TAM) and its derivative model as the theoretical framework to deeply explore the factors that affect the acceptance of service robots. Various factors revealed by TAM technology acceptance model and its derivative model will be discussed in depth respectively. This study will help to reveal all possible factors that affect user acceptance of service robots, such as functional elements, emotional elements and users' own characteristics, for future research.
References
Fred D. Davis. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology[J]. MIS quarterly, 1989: 319-340.
Bandura, A. (1977), “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change”, Psychological Review, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 191-215.
Beach, L.R. and Mitchell, T.R. "A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies," Academy of Management Review (3:3), July 1978, pp. 439-449.
Johnson, E.J. and Payne, J.W. "Effort and Accuracy in Choice," Management Science (31:4), April 1985, pp. 395-414.
Tornatzky, L.G. and Klein, K.J. "Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (EM-29:1), February 1982, pp. 28-45.
Larcker, D.F. and Lessig, V.P. "Perceived Usefulness of Information: A Psychometric Examination," Decision Sciences (11:1), January 1980, pp. 121-134.
Viswanath Venkatesh,Fred D. Davis, (2000)A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46(2):186-204.
Mahtab Ghazizadeh,Yiyun Peng,John D. Lee,Linda Ng Boyle2.Augmenting the Technology Acceptance Model with Trust: Commercial Drivers’ Attitudes towards Monitoring and Feedback.PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS and ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 56th ANNUAL MEETING – 2012.
Marcel Heerink·Ben Kröse·Vanessa Evers ·Bob Wielinga.Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model.Int J Soc Robot (2010) 2: 361–375.
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manag Inf Syst Q 27(3):425–478.
de Ruyter B, Saini P, Markopoulos P, van Breemen AJN (2005) Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home. Soc Impact Emerg Technol 17(5):522–541.
Sebastian Osswald, Daniela Wurhofer, Sandra Trösterer,Elke Beck,Manfred Tscheligi.Predicting Information Technology Usage in the Car:Towards a Car Technology Acceptance Model.
Jochen Wirtz, Paul G. Patterson, Werner H. Kunz, Thorsten Gruber, Vinh Nhat Lu, Stefanie Paluch, Antje Martins, (2018) "Brave new world: service robots in the frontline", Journal of Service Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0119.
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C. and Glick, P. (2007), “Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence”, Trends in Cognitive Science, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 77-83.
Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T. and Glick, P. (2008), “Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: the stereotype content model and the BIAS map”, in Zanna, M.P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 40, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 61-149.
Ames, D.R. and Flynn, F.J. (2007), “What breaks a leader: the curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 92 No. 2, pp. 307-324.
Soloman, M., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. and Gutman, E. (1985), “The role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: the service encounter”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 99-111.
Giebelhausen, M., Robinson, S.G., Sirianni, N.J. and Brady, M.K. (2014), “Touch versus tech: when technology functions as a barrier or a benefit to service encounters”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 78 No. 4, pp. 113-124.
Waytz A, Norton M I. Botsourcing and outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German workers are for thinking—not feeling—jobs[J]. Emotion, 2014, 14(2): 434.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
