Research on the Role of Academic Competitions in the Cultivation of Business Talents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.52Keywords:
Academic Competition, Business Talent Cultivation, Promoting Learning through CompetitionAbstract
Continuously improving the training quality of college students to better meet local development needs for high-quality talent is an important goal for universities. The traditional classroom teaching model is teacher-centered, which limits students' opportunities for active participation. In the context of new business education, the model of cultivating business talent through academic competitions has been widely adopted. This model focuses on enhancing students' practical and innovative abilities, aiming to improve their overall competencies and significantly boost their employment competitiveness. This paper explores the importance of academic competitions in cultivating business talents, the existing challenges in business talent cultivation, and pathways of cultivating business talents based on academic competition, and discusses how to enhance the quality of business talent training, improve students' professional knowledge, stimulate innovative thinking, and strengthen teamwork, lifelong learning, and self-management skills. The goal of this paper is to contribute significantly to achieving the strategic objective of cultivating innovative talent in universities and enhancing long-term educational effectiveness.
References
[1] Bennis W, O'Toole J. How Business Schools Lost Their Way [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2005, 83(5): 96-104+154.
[2] Campbell J R, Walberg H J. Olympiad Studies: Competitions Provide Alternatives to Developing Talents That Serve National Interests [J]. Roeper Review, 2011, 33(1): 8-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.530202
[3] Shdaifat S, Saa J A. Identifying the Extent of Using Methods for Developing Students’ Creative Thinking by the Upper Primary Teachers in Public Schools in Tulkarem & Irbid [J]. Modern Applied Science, 2019, 13(12): 93-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v13n12p93
[4] Poelmans H, Sacchetti L, Vancauwenbergh S, Piazza S. Fuzzy Data Definitions Distort Fair Comparability of Universities in University Rankings: Results from Italy and Belgium on the Times Higher Education Ranking[J]. Quality in Higher Education, 2024, 30(1): 75-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2023.2173967
[5] Xinqi S. Analyzing the Relationship between International Accreditation and the Quality of High-End Business Talents in China [J]. International Journal of Education and Practice, 2018, 6(4): 206-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.64.206.215
[6] Sanusi F, Januarsi Y, Purbasari I, Akhmadi. The Discipline vs Complement Role of Product Market Competition and Market Power: Evidence from Real Earnings Management in an Emerging Market [J]. Cogent Business & Management, 2023, 10(1): 2170072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2170072
[7] Carter J D, Burke M G, Hughey A. The Influence of Business Case Study Competitions on Students’ Perceptions of Learning [J]. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 2019, 82(4): 475-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619829900
[8] Hofstetter R, Zhang J Z, Herrmann A. Successive Open Innovation Contests and Incentives: Winner-Take-All or Multiple Prizes? [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2018, 35(4): 105-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12424
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
