Analysis DevOps efficiency and digital transformation of digital economy, cross-border e-commerce, and brand building:

*Note: Evidence GuangDong manufacturing industry in Chinese Guangdong Province

Authors

  • Jianzhong Li
  • Qiang Wan
  • Wenjuan Ma
  • Xiaoting Fang
  • Chuyi Yin
  • Jun Cui

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/gc7xf329

Keywords:

DevOps Abilities, Automation testing, Communication Technology Adoption Model (ICTAM) and TAM model and CD, mixed method of qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Abstract

As IT-based DevOps Abilities and Automation testing theory, this study examines factors that encourage and discourage DevOps abilities and automation technology have become a major trend in the development of internet or IT enterprises, The main aim of this paper is to investigate how the use of DevOps has affected the quality of software. Another main aim is to explore and identify ways to continuously increase software quality. One way of finding information on this study is to conduct a literature review. This article uses the ICTAM and TAM theoretical model for analysis. A literature review was developed to gather quantitative data while DevOps Abilities and Quality Assurance experts' interviews were used to determine how DevOps and automation testing can enhance software quality and improve software development efficiency. Interview reviews, Sampling questionaries, hypothesis testing, and regression tests are recommendations. Five semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts and analyzed through the lens of the Interactive Communication Technology Adoption Model (ICTAM) as a guiding framework. Moreover, through a series of data investigation and analysis, DevOps Abilities and Automation testing can help many companies quickly and accurately improve software development efficiency and quality. The results demonstrated that China internet company's DevOps and automation technology helps enterprise’s continuous integration and continuous delivery, automation testing and monitor etc. DevOps and CI/CD is one of the best practices for devops teams to implement. The findings is also an agile methodology best practice, as it enables software development teams to focus on meeting business requirements, code quality, and security because deployment steps are automated. Based on DevOps Abilities, Automation testing, CI, CD concepts, many companies can continuously improve their software R&D efficiency and software quality. The research of this paper mainly uses the mixed method of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis to conduct research and analysis, and uses excel or SPSS 23 software to perform ANOVA analysis on the sample data, Finally, this study contributions concludes the importance of DevOps and Automation testing to China Software company.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Karamitsos, I., Albarhami, S. and Apostolopoulos, C., 2020. Applying DevOps practices of continuous automation for machine learning. Information, 11(7), p.363.

Erich, F., Amrit, C. and Daneva, M., 2014. Report: Devops literature review. University of Twente, Tech. Rep.

Ozkaya, I., 2019. Are DevOps and Automation Our Next Silver Bullet?. IEEE Software, 36(4), pp.3-95.

Bou Ghantous, G. and Gill, A., 2017. DevOps: Concepts, practices, tools, benefits and challenges. PACIS2017.

Perera, P., Bandara, M. and Perera, I., 2016, September. Evaluating the impact of DevOps practice in Sri Lankan software development organizations. In 2016 Sixteenth International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer) (pp. 281-287). IEEE.

Riungu-Kalliosaari, L., Mäkinen, S., Lwakatare, L.E., Tiihonen, J. and Männistö, T., 2016, November. DevOps adoption benefits and challenges in practice: A case study. In International conference on product-focused software process improvement (pp. 590-597). Springer, Cham.

Nurullah, F., Wang, G., Kaburuan, E.R. and Fajar, A.N., 2018, September. The Collaboration of DevOps Automation and SOA to Accelerate Software Development Culture. In 2018 Indonesian Association for Pattern Recognition International Conference (INAPR) (pp. 262-266). IEEE.

Banica, L., Radulescu, M., Rosca, D. and Hagiu, A., 2017. Is DevOps another project management methodology?. Informatica Economica, 21(3), p.39.

Mohammad, S.M., 2016. An exploratory study of DevOps and it's future in the United States. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), ISSN, pp.2320-2882.

Vadapalli, S., 2018. DevOps: continuous delivery, integration, and deployment with DevOps: dive into the core DevOps strategies. Packt Publishing Ltd.

Luz, W.P., Pinto, G. and Bonifácio, R., 2019. Adopting DevOps in the real world: A theory, a model, and a case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 157, p.110384.

Yarlagadda, R.T., 2018. Understanding DevOps & bridging the gap from continuous integration to continuous delivery. Understanding DevOps & Bridging the Gap from Continuous Integration to Continuous Delivery', International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www. jetir. org), ISSN, pp.2349-5162.

Toh, M.Z., Sahibuddin, S. and Mahrin, M.N.R., 2019, February. Adoption issues in DevOps from the perspective of continuous delivery pipeline. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications (pp. 173-177).

Marijan, D., Liaaen, M. and Sen, S., 2018, July. DevOps improvements for reduced cycle times with integrated test optimizations for continuous integration. In 2018 IEEE 42nd annual computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC) (Vol. 1, pp. 22-27). IEEE.

Chen, L., 2018, April. Microservices: architecting for continuous delivery and DevOps. In 2018 IEEE International conference on software architecture (ICSA) (pp. 39-397). IEEE.

Jabbari, R., bin Ali, N., Petersen, K. and Tanveer, B., 2018. Towards a benefits dependency network for DevOps based on a systematic literature review. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30(11), p.e1957.

Di Nitto, E., Jamshidi, P., Guerriero, M., Spais, I. and Tamburri, D.A., 2016, July. A software architecture framework for quality-aware DevOps. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality-Aware DevOps (pp. 12-17).

Lin, C. A. (2003). An interactive communication technology adoption model. Communication Theory, 13(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003. tb00296.x

Toufaily, E., Zalan, T., & Dhaou, S. B. (2021). A framework of blockchain technology adoption: An investigation of challenges and expected value. Information & Management, 58(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103444

Dehghani, M., William Kennedy, R., Mashatan, A., Rese, A., & Karavidas, D. (2022). High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology. Journal of Business Restheory perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1457–1491. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-08-2018-0365 Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research ((4th ed.).). SAGE Publications Inc.

Cui, J., Chen, W., Wan, Q., Gan, Z., & Ning, Z. (2024). Design and Analysis of a Mobile Automation Testing Framework: Evidence and AI Enhancement from Chinese Internet Technological Companies: A Case Study. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 14(2), 163-170.

Agarwal, A., Gupta, S., & Choudhury, T. (2018, June). Continuous and integrated software development using DevOps. In 2018 International conference on advances in computing and communication engineering (ICACCE) (pp. 290-293). IEEE.

Karamitsos, I., Albarhami, S., & Apostolopoulos, C. (2020). Applying DevOps practices of continuous automation for machine learning. Information, 11(7), 363.

Jammeh, B. (2020). DevSecOps: Security Expertise a Key to Automated Testing in CI/CD Pipeline. Bournemouth University.

Yarlagadda, R. T. (2018). Understanding DevOps & bridging the gap from continuous integration to continuous delivery. Understanding DevOps & Bridging the Gap from Continuous Integration to Continuous Delivery', International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www. jetir. org), ISSN, 2349-5162.

Mohammad, S. M. (2016). Continuous integration and automation. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), ISSN, 2320-2882.

Clohessy, T., & Acton, T. (2019). Investigating the influence of organizational factors on blockchain adoption: An innovation

Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison oftwotheoretical models”, Management Science, Vol. 35No. 8,pp.982-1003.

King, R.C. and Gribbins, M.L. (2002), “Internet technology adoption as an organizational event: an exploratory study across industries”, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 35th Annual HawaiiInternational Conference on System Sciences, 2002. HICSS.

Pham, T.-T.T. and Ho, J.C. (2015), “The effects of product-related, personal-related factors and attractiveness of alternatives on consumer adoption of NFC-based mobile payments”, Technology in Society, Vol. 43, pp. 159-172.

Daft, R. (2006), Organization Theory and Design, Cengage learning, Boston, MA.

Downloads

Published

20-06-2024

How to Cite

“Analysis DevOps efficiency and digital transformation of digital economy, cross-border e-commerce, and brand building:: *Note: Evidence GuangDong manufacturing industry in Chinese Guangdong Province” (2024) Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 4, pp. 38–47. doi:10.62051/gc7xf329.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 90

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.